Exter v. Sawyer
Decision Date | 17 October 1898 |
Citation | 47 S.W. 951,146 Mo. 302 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | EXTER et al. v. SAWYER et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; P. R. Flitcraft, Judge.
Suit by Fred C. Exter and other stock owners of the Edgefield Land & Improvement Company against Charles H. Sawyer and others to cancel certain deeds of trust and notes of the company given to the defendant Sawyer, and to recover moneys paid him by the company, and wrongfully appropriated by him. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant Charles H. Sawyer appeals. Affirmed.
About the middle of March, 1890, the defendant Charles H. Sawyer having conceived the idea of forming a company for the purpose of buying a certain tract of land of about 100 acres in St. Louis county, he submitted the following instrument of writing, and another, to be hereafter mentioned, to certain parties, and induced the plaintiff and the individual defendants and the Farmers' Co-operative Club to become subscribers thereto for the amounts set opposite their respective names:
Sawyer began procuring subscriptions to this list about the middle of March, 1890. It took a week or 10 days to get the necessary amount to buy the land subscribed. The subscriptions were all paid to Sawyer. As soon as a sufficient amount was subscribed to pay for this tract of land, Sawyer conceived the idea of enlarging the proposed company, increasing its capital, and selling to it a certain tract of land, known in this litigation as the "Ramona Tract," for which purpose he issued a second subscription list, which was in words and figures as follows:
All of the payments for stock called for by the subscription lists were made to Sawyer, and by him deposited to his personal account, and used by him in the acquisition of the two tracts of land for the acquirement of which he secured the organization of the Edgefield Land & Improvement Company. Sawyer first contemplated purchasing the Jennings tract in January or February, 1890, and about the same time procured an option upon it in writing from Jennings at $300 an arpent. On March 15, 1890, Sawyer and Jennings entered into a further agreement in regard to the same tract, at which time Sawyer paid him the sum of $1,000 earnest money. This contract is as follows:
On April 14, 1890, Jennings and wife conveyed the Jennings tract to C. H. Sawyer; the nominal consideration in the deal being $50,000, and the real consideration being $35,100. The nominal consideration was inserted at Sawyer's request. On April 28, 1890, Sawyer and wife conveyed to the Edgefield Land & Improvement Company the Jennings tract reciting in the deed a consideration of $80,283. Sawyer says he took the first steps towards acquiring the title to the Ramona tract in December, 1889. His efforts to acquire the Ramona tract at that time resulted in the execution of the following agreement between Sawyer and the owners of said Ramona tract:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Bigelow
... ... Getty v. Devlin, 54 N.Y. 403, s. c. 70 N.Y. 504; ... Loudenslager v. Woodbury Heights Land Co., 58 N. J ... Eq. 556, 560, 43 A. 671; Exter ... Devlin, 54 N.Y. 403, s. c. 70 N.Y. 504; ... Loudenslager v. Woodbury Heights Land Co., 58 N. J ... Eq. 556, 560, 43 A. 671; Exter v. Sawyer ... ...
-
State ex rel. Duggan v. Kirkwood
...Co. v. Dierks, 18 S.W.2d 1043, 322 Mo. 1064. (15) The principal is subrogated to the fruits of the agent's disloyalty. Exeter v. Sawyer, 146 Mo. 302, 47 S.W. 951; Murdock v. Milner, 84 Mo. 96; Arpe Brown, 51 S.W.2d 225, 227 Mo.App. 60; Garner v. Woods, 24 S.W.2d 708; Holt v. Dieckmann R.E. ......
-
Rossi v. Davis
... ... Corp., sec. 1313, pp. 820, 821; 13 ... Fletcher, Enc. Corp., sec. 5997, p. 300; 3 Pomeroy's ... Equit. Jurisp., sec. 1095; Exter v. Sawyer, 146 Mo ... 302, 324-5, 47 S.W. 951; Gruen v. Schaeffer, 7 ... Mo.App. 587 (Memorandum opinion).] If the corporation has ... ...
-
Brooker v. William H. Thompson Trust Company
...v. Richter, 26 Misc. (N. Y.) 26; Erlanger v. Phosphate Co., L. R. 3 App. Cas. 1208; Gluckstein v. Barnes [1900], App. Cas. 240; Exter v. Sawyer, 146 Mo. 323; Land Co. Flash, 97 Cal. 612; 2 Cook on Corps., secs. 650, 652; 3 Clark & Marsh. on Corps., sec. 758; Thompson on Corps., secs. 4024, ......