F.F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner
| Decision Date | 19 December 1955 |
| Citation | 146 N.Y.S.2d 788,1 A.D.2d 690 |
| Parties | F. F. SHORE & CO., Inc., and Felix F. Shore, Respondents, v. Allan J. ROMANER, Nathan Kramer, Chester's Turnpike, Inc., and Myron J. Glantz, as escrow agent, Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Maurice Knapp, New York City, for appellants.
George E. Netter, New York City, Milton Waxenfeld, Helen M. Wolfsohn, New York City, on brief, for respondents. Before NOLAN, P. J., and WENZEL, MURPHY, UGHETTA and BELDOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action for rescission of the sale of a business and for other relief, the appeal is from an order enjoining pendente lite, on conditions, the disposal of promissory notes constituting part of the purchase price and collateral.
Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
The injunction comes within the scope of section 878, Civil Practice Act, if the disposition of the notes would tend to render the judgment ineffectual. Ocorr v. Lynn, 105 Misc. 489, 173 N.Y.S. 518; cf. Babho Realty Co., Inc., v. Feffer, 230 App.Div. 866, 245 N.Y.S. 118.
BELDOCK, J., not voting.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wenz v. Globecomm Sys., Inc.
...Corp. v. Hamlet on Olde Oyster Bay Homeowners Assn., Inc., 21 AD3d 777, 801 N.Y.S.2d 25 [2d Dept 2005]; F.F. Shore & Co. v. Romaner, 1 A.D.2d 690, 146 N.Y.S.2d 788 [2d Dept 1955] ). The second category is commonly the action for a permanent injunction, that is, a judgment is sought restrain......
- Vallone v. Regan
- Schnall v. City of New York