Facey v. City of N.Y.
| Decision Date | 10 May 2017 |
| Parties | Juniepa FACEY, etc., appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., defendants, Nassau County, et al., respondents. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Stewart Law Firm, PLLC, Rosedale, NY (Charmaine M. Stewart and Nadira S. Stewart of counsel; Tarik A. Stewart on the brief), for appellant.
Carnell T. Foskey, County Attorney, Mineola, NY (Robert F. Van der Waag and Christi Kunzig of counsel), for respondents.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, and BETSY BARROS, JJ.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated May 6, 2015, as denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the defendants Nassau County, Nassau County Police Department, Nassau County Emergency Medical Services, Clarence Hudson, Estate of Artie Lopez, and "John Doe" 1–100.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
On October 23, 2012, the plaintiff's decedent, Raymond Facey, was shot and killed by nonparty Darrell Fuller. On October 22, 2014, the plaintiff, individually and as the administrator of the decedent's estate, commenced this action against various municipal entities and their employees by filing a summons with notice and contemporaneously moving for leave to serve and file a late notice of claim. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the defendants were negligent "in their failure to follow proper procedures and protocol when officers gave chase to [Fuller] despite being directed not to do so." The Supreme Court, inter alia, denied the plaintiff's motion on the basis that she failed to demonstrate that the defendants acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts underlying her claims within the requisite time period. The plaintiff appeals from so much of the Supreme Court's order as denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the defendants Nassau County, Nassau County Police Department, Nassau County Emergency Medical Services, Clarence Hudson, Estate of Artie Lopez, and "John Doe" 1–100 (hereinafter together the Nassau County defendants).
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in finding that the plaintiff provided a reasonable excuse for her failure to serve a timely notice of claim (see generally Matter of Staley v. Piper, 285 A.D.2d 601, 602, 728 N.Y.S.2d 88 ). However, the plaintiff failed to establish that the Nassau County defendants had actual knowledge of the "essential facts constituting the claim" (General Municipal Law § 50–e[5] )....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nunez v. Vill. of Rockville Ctr.
...police officer does not establish that the Village acquired actual knowledge of any wrongdoing on its part (see Facey v. City of New York, 150 A.D.3d 826, 827, 54 N.Y.S.3d 115 ; Matter of Lenoir v. New York City Hous. Auth., 240 A.D.2d 497, 498, 658 N.Y.S.2d 140 ; Matter of Plantin v. New Y......
-
U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Robinson
... ... Silverberg, PLLC, Uniondale, NY, for appellants.McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, New York, N.Y. (Matthew Blum of counsel), for ... ...
-
Melcer v. City of N.Y.
...claims against them (see Matter of Vega v. Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 164 A.D.3d 514, 515, 83 N.Y.S.3d 290 ; Facey v. City of New York, 150 A.D.3d 826, 827, 54 N.Y.S.3d 115 ). The NYPD complaint, which indicated only that the decedent was stabbed multiple times upon the body causing his......
-
Etrade Bank v. Ejenam
... ... Obiora LLC, Jamaica, NY, for appellant.Knuckles, Komosinski & Manfro, LLP, Elmsford, N.Y. (Edward L. Poff and Louis A ... ...