Facion v. State, 72--669

Decision Date20 February 1974
Docket NumberNo. 72--669,72--669
Citation290 So.2d 75
PartiesLonnie B. FACION, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Richard M. Robbins, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David Luther Woodward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant Lonnie B. Facion pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of carrying a concealed firearm, preserving his right to appeal the issue of his exception under F.S. § 790.25(3)(n) F.S.A. 1

At the hearing on Facion's motion to change his plea of not guilty, the testimony of the arresting officer was taken. The officer testified that he responded to a call from a citizen complaining that a man had been firing a gun in the air in the vicinity of her house. The woman who reported the incident gave him a description of the man, known to her as Lonnie, and pointed out the apartment where he lived. The officer went to the apartment, was invited in by Lonnie's wife and told that Lonnie was not there. As he was leaving the apartment he saw a man who answered the description coming out of an alley around the apartment building about fifteen feet from the front door. When the man was approximately five feet from the door to his apartment, the officer stopped him and he stepped up from the sidewalk on a porchway which runs the length of the four-unit apartment building. The officer asked him if his name was Lonnie, and at the same time noticed a bulge in his right front pocket. The officer immediately patted him down, removed the weapon and placed him under arrest for carrying a concealed firearm in violation of F.S. § 790.01(2) F.S.A.

Facion contends that since he was arrested approximately five feet from the door to his rented apartment in an area in common on the leased premises, that he was 'at his home' and came within the exception to the statute relating to unlawful carrying of concealed firearms.

Sub-section 3 of § 790.25 provides that the licensing requirements and prohibitions of F.S. §§ 790.05 and 790.06 F.S.A. shall not apply to (n) 'A person possessing arms at his home or place of business.'

In French v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So.2d 317, the Fourth District Court of Appeal concluded that F.S. § 790.25 F.S.A. must be read in pari materia with F.S. §§ 790.01, 790.05 and 790.06 F.S.A., and under this construction the carrying of a concealed firearm in one's own home is not prohibited by F.S. § 790.01(2) F.S.A.

Facion was not In his own home, but was in a common area of the demised premises. If the Florida statute had exempted persons in their own homes or on their own premises, w...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • People v. Marrow
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • May 5, 1995
    ...set apart to the public and must be used by it? [Moss v. Arkansas, 65 Ark. 368, 369-370, 45 S.W. 987 (1898).] See also Facion v. State, 290 So.2d 75 (Fla.App., 1975) (the defendant had no right to carry concealed pistol on sidewalk outside his apartment); Roy v. State, 552 S.W.2d 827, 829 (......
  • Burgess v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1975
    ...to appeal the trial court's denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. State v. Ashby, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 225; Faction v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 290 So.2d 75. Since the evidence did not show any lawful basis for the appellant's arrest, he could not be found guilty of resisting arrest......
  • Brant v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 9, 1977
    ...the defendant withdraw his gun from underneath his shirt. Thus, defendant does not fall within the above exception. See Facion v. State, 290 So.2d 75 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). HUBBART, Judge (concurring). I concur in the court's opinion and judgment and would add that the police seizure of the gun......
  • Cates v. State, 81-723
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 1982
    ...that the section 790.25(3) exceptions are applicable to section 790.01. Peoples v. State, 287 So.2d 63 (Fla.1973); Facion v. State, 290 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); French v. State, 279 So.2d 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). See Russ v. State, 304 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). In addition, if the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT