Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Pratt
Citation | 6 Conn.Cir.Ct. 537,278 A.2d 154 |
Decision Date | 27 April 1971 |
Docket Number | No. CV,CV |
Court | Connecticut Circuit Court |
Parties | , 9 UCC Rep.Serv. 202 FAIRFIELD LEASE CORPORATION v. Marcel PRATT. 7-665-8233. |
Samuel M. Chambliss, Bridgeport, for plaintiff.
Thomas B. Griglum, Meriden, for defendant.
On January 7, 1966, U-Vend, Inc., of Yonkers, New York, hereinafter referred to as the lessor, and the defendant, the lessee, entered into a so-called lease agreement which provided for the rental of a coffee machine for the term of thirty-six months beginning on the date of delivery of the machine to the lessee. For the use of the equipment, the lessee agreed to pay the lessor rent of $39.50 per month for thirty-six consecutive months beginning on January 10, 1966. The lease contained an acceleration clause (clause 15) by the terms of which, in event of default, the lessee Clause 22 provided that '(t)his agreement shall be deemed to have been made in the State of New York, regardless of the order in which the signature of the parties shall be affixed hereto, and shall be interpreted, and the rights and liabilities of the parties hereto determined, in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.' Clause 19 contained a provision for waiver of defense on the part of the lessee as against the lessor's assignee. On January 17, 1966, by an instrument entitled 'Assignment of Lease,' the lessor assigned all of its rights and remedies under the lease to the plaintiff.
The complaint alleged that 'the defendant defaulted in making the payment due on March 10, 1966'; that the assignee 'duly notified the defendant but the same and subsequent payments have not been paid'; and that '(s)aid (Lease) Agreement provides, in the event of default, that the plaintiff may declare the entire unpaid balance due and for expenses of collection and attorney's fees in the amount of twenty (20%) per cent of said unpaid balance.' The plaintiff claimed damages of $1700. The answer in effect amounted to a general denial. A paragraph of the special defense may be construed as setting up the defense that the lease agreement was invalid as being 'unreasonable and contrary to law.'
Undoubtedly, parties to a contract may expressly select the choice of law by which it is to be governed. Pollak v. Danbury Mfg. Co., 103 Conn. 553, 557, 131 A. 426; 6A Corbin, Contracts § 1446, p. 485, n. 54; 16 Am.Jur.2d, Conflict of Laws, § 46. 'The (Uniform Commercial) Code's general choice of law provision leaves the determination of applicable law to common law principles.' 1 Gilmore, Security Interests in Personal Property § 10.8 p. 316. Under General Statutes § 42a-1-105(1), 'when a transaction bears a reasonable relation to this state and also to another state or nation the parties may agree that the law of this state or of such other state or nation shall govern their rights and duties.' The courts of this state are authorized by statute (see General Statutes §§ 51-32, 52-163, 52-164) to take judicial notice of the law of sister states.
The courts of the state of New York have construed an assigned lease which was identical with the lease agreement now before this court. In Fairfield Lease Corporation v. Umberto, 7 U.C.C.Rep. 1181, 1183, the Civil Court of the City of New York said of that assigned lease:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gannett Co., Inc. v. Register Pub. Co.
...and enforcement of their agreement. Pollak v. Danbury Mfg. Co., 103 Conn. 553, 131 A. 426 (1925); Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Pratt, 6 Conn.Cir. 537, 278 A.2d 154 (1971); Vending Credit Corp. v. Trudy Toys Co., 5 Conn.Cir. 629, 260 A.2d 135 (1969). The parties made such a stipulation in § 15(c......
-
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Duracell Intern. Inc.
...Co., 428 F.Supp. 818, 824 (D.Conn.1977); Pollak v. Danbury Mfg. Co., 103 Conn. 553, 131 A. 426 (1925); Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Pratt, 6 Conn.Cir. 537, 278 A.2d 154 (1971). Not only is the choice of law clause one of apparent good faith, but also Connecticut has a substantial relationship t......
-
Valley Juice Ltd., Inc. v. Evian Waters of France, Inc.
...545, 14 Conn.App. 481 (1988); see also Pollak v. Danbury Mfg. Co., 131 A. 426, 428, 103 Conn. 553 (1925); Fairfield Lease Corp. v. Pratt, 278 A.2d 154, 155, 6 Conn.Cir.Ct. 537 (1971); Vending Credit Corp. v. Trudy Toys Co., 260 A.2d 135, 138, 5 Conn.Cir.Ct. 629 (1969). In applying contractu......
-
Murphy v. McNamara
...64 Misc.2d 910, 316 N.Y.S.2d 585. Section 2-302 of the Uniform Commercial Code has been applied to leases. Fairfield Lease Corporation v. Pratt, 6 Conn.Cir. 537, 278 A.2d 154. It is clear that an unconscionable rental would constitute an unfair trade practice if the lessee had unequal barga......