Falco v. City of New York
| Decision Date | 20 April 1970 |
| Parties | Anthony FALCO, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Richard Frank, New York City, for appellant; Benjamin Heller, New York City, of counsel.
J. Lee Rankin, Corp. Counsel, New York City, for respondent; Stanley Buchsbaum, Brooklyn, Eric J. Byrne, New York City, of counsel.
Before CHRIST, P.J., and RABIN, HOPKINS, MUNDER and BRENNAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 2, 1969, which set aside a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff and dismissed the complaint, and (2) an order of said court dated May 9, 1969, which, granting reargument and reconsideration, adhered to the original decision setting aside the verdict and dismissing the complaint.
Judgment and order affirmed, without costs.
'The complaint having been dismissed, this court must, in determining whether the facts proved constitute a cause of action, give the appellant the benefit of every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn' (Faber v. City of New York, 213 N.Y. 411, 414, 107 N.E. 756, 757).
The proof in behalf of plaintiff was that plaintiff, riding a motorcycle, was struck by a motor vehicle and thrown to the ground, sustaining severe injuries. While lying on the ground in pain, he asked a police officer of the City of New York, then present and investigating the accident, to obtain for him the name and license number of the driver of the motor vehicle. The plaintiff testified that the police officer said-- Afterward the plaintiff observed the officer talking with the driver but the officer failed to record the name and address of the driver, thus making it impossible for plaintiff to institute a negligence action against the driver of the automobile.
The basic issue is whether defendant city may be held liable for the negligence of a police officer in investigating an accident because of a gratuitous promise made by him to an injured party to obtain the name of another party allegedly involved in the accident, and his failure to perform that promise.
In our opinion, the verdict was properly set aside. There was no such relationship on the part of the plaintiff to the defendant as created a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Chambers-Castanes v. King County
...Ins. Co., 83 Wash.2d 787, 523 P.2d 193 (1974). The only authority of which we are aware is to the contrary. See Falco v. New York, 34 A.D.2d 673, 310 N.Y.S.2d 524 (1970), aff'd, 29 N.Y.2d 918, 329 N.Y.S.2d 97 (1972). Further, we note with interest that during oral argument appellants' lawye......
-
Warren v. District of Columbia
...of conduct, special knowledge of possible harm, or the actual use of individuals in the investigation. See Falco v. City of New York, 34 A.D.2d 673, 310 N.Y.S.2d 524 (App. Div.1970), aff'd, 29 N.Y.2d 918, 329 N.Y. S.2d 97, 279 N.E.2d 854 (1972) (police statement to injured motorcyclist that......
-
Caldwell v. City of Philadelphia
...upon the police and the City where the driver has violated his express statutory duty to give information. In Falco v. City of New York, 34 A.D.2d 673, 310 N.Y.S.2d 524 (1970), aff'd. 29 N.Y.2d 918, 329 N.Y.S.2d 97, 279 N.E.2d 854 (1972), the New York court considered a case factually simil......
-
Woods v. New York State Olympic Regional Development Authority
...of a police officer to secure the name of a motorist involved in an accident with an injured party (see, e.g., Falco v. City of New York, 34 A.D.2d 673, 310 N.Y.S.2d 524, aff'd 29 N.Y.2d 918, 329 N.Y.S.2d 97, 279 N.E.2d 854; McNeil v. Town of Hempstead, 60 Misc.2d 797, 303 N.Y.S.2d 803, aff......