Falkowski v. Imation Corp., 01-16113.
| Decision Date | 29 October 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 01-16113.,01-16113. |
| Parties | Mark W. FALKOWSKI; Michael Benz; Jean-Luc Chatelain; Phillippe C. Ciampossin; Craig W. Cornelius, Ph. D.; Gregg W. Cretella; John H. Davis; John D. Edwards; Anthony J. Fillicelli; Grady Floyd; Ingemar Gustafson; Arturo Gamboa; Srividya Krishnamachary; Matthew Long; Russell W. Loop, Sr.; Gregory J. Masek; Sanjay Mehta; Douglas A. Merk; Karl E. Minser; Linda J. Moore; Antruong Nguyen; Bang Nguyen; Dennis O'Dell; Gregory L. Orr; Tuan Pham; Eli Rapaich; Jonathan Reis; Brian K. Rice; Eric Rodriguez; Ken H. Rosenfeld; Jeremy Rubin, M.D.; Jan Schieberl; Rick Shroyer; Charles H. Smith; John Hampton Smith; Martha Torres; Dennis Totah; Vu Hao Truong; Sharon Woolsey, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMATION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; William T. Monahan; Bradley T. Sauer; Jill D. Burchill, Defendants-Appellees. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Neal A. Dublinsky, Lionel Z. Glancy, Law Offices of Lionel Z. Glancy, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellants.
James K. Langdon II, Andrew Holly, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for the appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Jeremy Fogel, J., Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-21072-JF.
Before HALL, KOZINSKI, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
The panel recalls the mandate that issued on November 20, 2002 for the limited purpose of amending the opinion filed October 29, 2002, 309 F.3d 1123 as follows:
1) In the second sentence of part IVB, insert "to the extent the claims are grounded in fraud," after ("under this chapter") and before "they are subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)".
In accordance with this Court's General Orders, no further petitions for rehearing may be filed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Enron Corp. v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc., MDL 1446
..."no-sale" doctrine. Plaintiffs rely on decision by the Ninth Circuit inPage 59 Falkowski v. Imation Corp., 309 F.3d 1123 (2002), amended, 320 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2003), that is contrary to the Cedant cases and to the 1980 SEC Release. The panel in Falkowski, interpreting SLUSA and its preemp......
-
Grund v. Del. Charter Guarantee & Trust Co. D/B/A Principal Trust Co.
...connection to the securities themselves.’ ” Falkowski v. Imation Corp., 309 F.3d 1123, 1130–31 (9th Cir.2002), as amended in 320 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2003) (quoting Ambassador Hotel Co. v. Wei–Chuan Inv., 189 F.3d 1017, 1026 (9th Cir.1999)). Explaining further, the court in Falkowski noted tha......
-
Enron Corp. v. Ubs Painewebber, Inc.
...doctrine.Plaintiffs rely on decision by the Ninth Circuit in Falkowski v. Imation Corp. , 309 F.3d 1123 (2002), amended , 320 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2003), that is contrary to the Cedant cases and to the 1980 SEC Release. The panel in Falkowski , interpreting SLUSA and its preemption of class a......
-
In re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa
...Inc., 295 F.3d 875, 877 (8th Cir.2002); Falkowski v. Imation Corp., 309 F.3d 1123, 1128 (9th Cir.2002), amended on other grounds, 320 F.3d 905 (9th Cir.2003); Behlen v. Merrill Lynch, 311 F.3d 1087, 1091-93 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2583, 156 L.Ed.2d 605 Thus a ......