Fallica v. Town of Brookhaven
Decision Date | 06 August 1979 |
Citation | 419 N.Y.S.2d 102,69 A.D.2d 579 |
Parties | Frank FALLICA et al., suing in their official capacity as all of the members of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Holtsville Fire District, and individually, Appellants, v. The TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Frederic Block, Smithtown (Joel Markowitz, Smithtown, of counsel), for appellants.
Joseph R. Mulee, Town Atty., Patchogue (Benjamin L. Herzweig, Asst. Town Atty., Patchogue, of counsel), for respondents.
Before SUOZZI, J. P., and LAZER, GULOTTA, SHAPIRO and COHALAN, JJ.
In the judgment appealed from, Special Term made the following determinations:
THE ISSUE.
Section 181 of article 11 of the Town Law sets forth how a fire district, such as the one involved here, is to be funded. Subdivision 1 of section 181 provides, in part:
"After the annual budget has been adopted by the town board and a certified copy presented to the board of supervisors of the county in which the town is situated the board of supervisors shall assess and levy upon the taxable real property within the several fire districts the amounts to be raised by tax for the purposes of the respective districts as specified in such annual budget and shall cause the amount so assessed and levied to be collected, in the same manner and at the same time and by the same officers as town taxes are assessed, levied and collected."
The issue here is whether the land in question, leased by the town to the Federal government for use as an Internal Revenue Center, is tax exempt because it is "held for a public use" under the provisions of the Real Property Tax Law (§ 406, subd. 1) so that no tax may be assessed or levied thereon for the funding of the fire district in which it is located. We hold that in this case the land is not "held for a public use" and that, accordingly, it may be charged with its pro rata share for the maintenance of the fire district. Therefore the judgment appealed from should be modified as hereinafter stated.
THE FACTS.
On May 19, 1970, pursuant to the home rule request of the Town of Brookhaven, the State Legislature adopted chapter 972 of the Laws of 1970 which authorized the town to acquire "by purchase, gift or dedication or by condemnation, land * * * in the town, as the site for an office building and related facilities primarily suitable for the purpose of providing space for the permanent activities, facilities and employees of the United States of America, acting by or through any authorized agency * * * (and) own, construct, reconstruct, alter, improve and add to, an office building and related facilities suitable for such purpose and use on such site" (L.1970, ch. 972, § 2, subds. (1), (2)).
Pursuant to that authority the town acquired 42 acres of land in one of its subdivisions, within the Holtsville Fire District, and leased it to the United States for an Internal Revenue Service Center (IRS Center) consisting of five buildings having an "outside to outside dimension gross area of 520,637" square feet. The IRS Center processes tax returns for approximately 50 million taxpayers.
The enabling act (L.1970, ch. 972, § 5) provided that the town was:
(Emphasis supplied.)
In its lease with the United States, the town agreed to provide "public and/or volunteer fire protection". Since the complex was contained in the fire district of Holtsville (a subdivision of the town) it is apparent that even without such a provision, the fire fighting services would have to be rendered by the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Holtsville Fire District.
The United States government took possession pursuant to a 20-year lease beginning July 1, 1972 at an annual rent of $3,065,568.25. The lease did Not provide that the United States of America was to make payment "in lieu of taxes, assessments or charges which otherwise might be levied upon, assessed or charged against such land and building" nor did it contain a provision that "any political subdivision" of the town was to receive payment (either directly from the lessee or indirectly from the lessor town) for the "performance of services by the * * * political subdivision for the benefit of such federal office building".
The lease contained "tax escalation" provisions to the effect that at the end of each five year interval the rent "will be adjusted to provide for increases or decreases in general real estate taxes", and that the tax adjustment "shall be 100% Of the increase or decrease of the total taxes". It then provided that "(p)roof of the amount of tax and evidence of payment will be furnished by the lessor". This was despite the fact that from its very inception the site, assessed by the town at $2,500,000, was listed on the town records as tax-exempt. Such exemption was based on the town's position that the site was "held for a public use" within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 406 of the Real Property Tax Law, which provides that "(r)eal property owned by a municipal corporation within its corporate limits held for a public use * * * shall be exempt from taxation and exempt from special ad valorem levies and special assessments".
In 1975 the lease was amended, Inter alia, by deletion of the tax escalation provisions and by reduction of the annual rent to $2,100,000.
The Holtsville Fire District is funded by taxes upon taxable real property located in the fire district in accordance with the provisions of the Town Law (§ 181, subd. 1). That statute provides that the board of commissioners of each fire district is to file with the town in which the fire district is located detailed estimates of the revenues to be received and the expenditures to be made during the following fiscal year, and that after the annual budget has been adopted by the town, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Michael v. Communications Workers of America AFL-CIO
... ... Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Town of Cortland, 68 Misc.2d 645, 649, 327 N.Y.S.2d 143 allowed town to make health benefit payments to ... Long Beach, 286 N.Y. 382, 36 N.E.2d 630 Fallica v. Brookhaven, 69 A.D.2d 579, 419 N.Y.S.2d 102 ). This is distinguished from the municipality or ... ...
-
In re Richmond Children's Center, Inc., Bankruptcy No. 83 B 20300.
... ... to a trust relationship as expressed by the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division in Fallica v. Town of Brookhaven, 69 A.D.2d 579, 419 N.Y.S.2d 102 (2nd Dep't 1979), modified, 52 N.Y.2d 794, ... ...
-
Landmark Colony at Oyster Bay v. Board of Sup'rs, Nassau County
... ... the $15,000 penalty, there was a vigorous and very high level ongoing debate as to whether the Town of Oyster Bay or the County Planning Commission should handle the processing of condominiums. [121 ... Corp. v. Board of Educ., 7 N.Y.2d 381, 198 N.Y.S.2d 68, 165 N.E.2d 758; Fallica v. Town of Brookhaven, 69 A.D.2d 579, 419 N.Y.S.2d 102; 1555 Boston Road Corp. v. Finance Admr. of ... ...
-
Colella v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau
... ... that a property within the community's borders is exempted from the tax rolls (see, Fallica v. Town of Brookhaven, 69 A.D.2d 579, 419 N.Y.S.2d 102, mod. on other grounds 52 N.Y.2d 794, 436 ... ...