Fambro v. Sparks
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | FELTON; SUTTON, C. J., and WORRILL |
| Citation | Fambro v. Sparks, 86 Ga.App. 726, 72 S.E.2d 473 (Ga. App. 1952) |
| Decision Date | 13 September 1952 |
| Docket Number | 34167,Nos. 34131,No. 1,s. 34131,1 |
| Parties | FAMBRO v. SPARKS et al. SPARKS et al. v. FAMBRO |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The motion to dismiss the writ of error on the main bill of exceptions is denied.
2. The court did not err in refusing to admit certain testimony.
3. The evidence demanded a finding that at the time of the collision in question the employee, Jelks, was not within the scope of his employment with the defendant partners, Sparks Motor Company.
4. The evidence demanded a finding that the employee, Jelks, was not an incompetent automobile driver.
C. F. Fambro sued Albert Jelks, Jr. and Sparks Motor Company, a partnership composed of Willis B. Sparks, Jr., M. Garten Sparks, and Mrs. Lucile M. Sparks, for damages allegedly due to the negligence of Jelks in the operation of an automobile while acting within the scope of his employment by Sparks Motor Company. The petition was in two counts. The first count alleged negligence on the part of Sparks Motor Company based on the doctrine of respondeat superior. The second count alleged original negligence on the part of the defendant company in hiring and retaining Jelks as an automobile salesman, when he was at all times alleged an incompetent driver, a fact known to the defendant company.
On the trial the defendant Jelks testified as follows as to count one: Walter Graham testified on behalf of the plaintiff as follows:
Fick Taylor testified on behalf of the plaintiff in part as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Ditmyer v. American Liberty Ins. Co., 43155
...Western Cas. & Surety Co. v. Strozier, 67 Ga.App. 41, 19 S.E.2d 433; Nicholas v. Callaway, 72 Ga.App. 41, 32 S.E.2d 836; Fambro v. Sparks, 86 Ga.App. 726, 72 S.E.2d 473; Cooley v. Tate, 87 Ga.App. 1, 73 S.E.2d 72; Windsor v. Chanticleer & Co., 89 Ga.App. 116, 78 S.E.2d 871; Fulton Bag & Cot......
-
Breeding v. Massey
...to receive evidence of prior acts, even in a negligent entrustment case. See Lix v. Gastian, 261 S.W.2d 497 (Mo.App. 1953); Fambro v. Sparks, 86 Ga.App. 726, 72 S.W.2d 473 (1952); Houlihan v. McCall, 197 Md. 130, 78 A.2d 661, 665 While one cannot predict with certainty whether the Arkansas ......
-
Kowaleski v. Kowaleski
...denied 335 U.S. 861, 69 S.Ct. 136, 93 L.Ed. 407; Camp v. Petroleum Carrier Corp., 204 S.C. 133, 28 S.E.2d 683; Fambro v. Sparks, 86 Ga.App. 726, 72 S.E.2d 473; Johns v. Hake, 15 Wash.2d 651, 131 P.2d 933; Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Capolino, Ohio App., 65 N.E.2d 287. Johns v. Hake, supra, wa......
-
Broesche v. Bullock, 90
...or accidents within a two year period prior to the accident made the basis of the suit, is probably insufficient (Fambro v. Sparks, 86 Ga.App. 726, 72 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals, Georgia), in this case the evidence presents proof of seven citations for moving traffic violations, a warning......