Fant v. Brissey

Decision Date03 April 1929
Docket Number12627.
Citation147 S.E. 632,150 S.C. 15
PartiesFANT et al. v. BRISSEY et al.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Anderson County; L. E Croft, Special Judge.

Action by Bertha A. Fant and Hattie McWhorter Fant, as administratrices with will annexed of O. H. P. Fant deceased, against W. L. Brissey and others. From an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

The amended complaint is as follows:

"The plaintiffs above named, pursuant to order herein, by their amended complaint, respectively show to the court:
"(1) That they elect to retain the cause of action in favor of trust estate of A. Davis Fant, in the original complaint as amended herein, and to bring a separate action by leave of the order of the Supreme Court herein, for and in behalf of the trust estate of T. Prue Fant.
"(2) That accordingly, plaintiffs allege, that on or about the 7th day of October, 1902, one O. H. P. Fant, a former resident and citizen of Anderson county, state of South Carolina, departed this life, leaving of force and effect, a last will and testament, which was submitted to probate in the county of Anderson, state aforesaid, on the 7th day of October, 1902, and is a matter of record therein, in Will-Book, No. 6, page 154 et seq., and indexed as part of File No. 4793, in said office, to which reference is craved and may be had.
"(3) That under said will, said O. H. P. Fant, made certain devises from his estate, to his son, Handy B. Fant, in trust, for the use and benefit of his two other sons, one of whom was A. Davis Fant, and under Paragraph VII of said will, the testator specifically charged said trust estate, with the necessity of being invested by the trustee, or his successor, in such property, or good interest-bearing securities, as would suit the several parties best; that he also provided that in the event of death or failure to qualify on
the part of any one of the trustees therein designated, then that the court of common pleas, appoint some strong bank, to act or 'direct the investment and management' of said trust estate, by its proper officers. That the said Handy B. Fant, was also nominated and appointed by said testator, as the executor of his said last will, and accordingly, said Handy B. Fant, upon the death of the said O. H. P. Fant, and the admitting of his will to probate, qualified as such executor, and continued to act in said capacity up till the time of his death.

"(4) That the People's Bank of Anderson, S. C., was, on or about the 12th day of January, 1899, organized and chartered under the general laws of the state for the purposes of a banking institution, with an authorized capitalization of two hundred thousand ($200,000.00) dollars, all of which was claimed by the encorporators, as having been paid in full. That said bank continued to do business as such, and in addition thereto, exercised its privileges under the law, to act as guardian, administrator, and as trustee, in certain cases, and that said bank accordingly, applied for, and was granted letters testamentary, de bonis non and with will annexed, of the will of said O. H. P. Fant, deceased, on or about the 15th day of July, 1919, succeeding in said capacity, and to all the liabilities attaching under the will and under the law, to Handy B. Fant, both as administrator and as trustee, for the estate and interest of the said A. Davis Fant.

"(5) That said People's Bank of Anderson, as administrator with will annexed, of O. H. P. Fant, deceased, and as trustee for the interests of A. Davis Fant, received from W. C. Fant, executor for the estate of Handy B. Fant, deceased, moneys, bank stock, mill stock, etc., in the aggregate of ten thousand ($10,000.00) dollars.

"(6) That on May 3, 1921, an annual meeting of the defendants herein as directors of said bank, was held. That at said meeting, it was decided and voted, that on account of the then-existing condition of the bank, the usual dividend to stockholders, would be postponed. That notwithstanding, said directors, the defendants herein, voted a resolution authorizing the officers of the bank, to make loans to the directors of the bank, specifying them by name, and among whom was Lee G. Holleman, at the time, president of the bank and a director. That said resolution was 'blanket' in form, is a matter of record in the Minute Book of the bank, at page 150, to which reference may be had. That said resolution contained no reservation or provision whereby the board of directors were to have submitted in proper form, applications for such loans, and first scrutinize and approve, or disapprove the security offered and the amounts, for which application should be made. That thereafter, and pursuant thereto, the said Lee G. Holleman, borrowed from said bank, from the trust fund held for A. Davis Fant, the sum of $5,565.00 without first submitting his application and such collateral as he cared to offer, and without having had first the approval in writing of two-thirds of the bank's directors, and soon thereafter ended his life and left a hopelessly insolvent estate.

"(7) That at said annual meeting, all former officers and directors of the bank were re-elected to succeed themselves, to wit: Lee G. Holleman, president, H. H. Watkins, vice president, E. P. Vandiver, cashier, T. S. Bannister, assistant cashier, Donald E. Brown, assistant cashier, F. L. Tucker, assistant cashier. Directors: E. P. Vandiver, H. H. Watkins, W. L. Brissey, W. H. Tucker, E. P. Gambrell, T. W. McCarley, J. F. Watson, H. V. G. Cooley, L. E. Dean, B. A. Henry, C. C. Jones, W. C. Fant, J. R. Findley and Lee G. Holleman, and with the exception of Lee G. Holleman and T. W. McCarley, since deceased, the defendants herein named, to wit: W. L. Brissey, L. E. Dean, W. C. Fant, J. R. Findley, B. A. Henry, C. C. Jones, H. V. G. Cooley, W. H. Tucker, E. P. Vandiver, H. H. Watkins, J. F. Watson and E. P. Gambrell, are directors of said bank and are individually residents of the County of Anderson, state aforesaid.

"(8) That at the close of business December 27, 1920, the state bank examiner, noted and called to the attention of the bank, as a result of his official audit, the following 'excess' loans: Lee G. Holleman, $16,203.19; Lee G. Holleman, 'overdraft' $4,415.77; Lee G. Holleman, endorser for $25,613.54; Overland-Holleman Company, of which it is alleged, Lee G. Holleman, was sole owner and proprietor, $25,000.00. That these obligations had not been reduced or paid at the time of the annual meeting of the directors, May 3, 1921.

"(9) That on June 1, 1921, when the capital of said bank was seriously impaired and when it was totally devoid of actual 'surplus' and when it was heavily involved, and when Lee G. Holleman, its president and one of its directors, was individually and as endorser and as owner of the Overland-Holleman Company, indebted to said bank considerably in excess of what the law of the state, allowed, and pursuant to 'authority' or permission, of the bank's directors at their meeting May 3, 1921, borrowed from the bank, from the fund held by said bank for A. Davis Fant, the sum of $5,565.00. That he executed to the bank as 'trustee,' his promissory note therefor, of date of said loan, bearing interest at the rate of eight per cent. per annum, and contemporaneously therewith, executed to said bank as 'trustee,' a real estate mortgage as security therefor, said mortgage being without renunciation of dower, and covering far less valuable lands than was represented by the obligations, and 'security,' from which there could, in no event, be realized the face of the loan.

"(10) That other obligations, which together with the obligation to the bank...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • White v. Harby
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 21 mars 1935
    ... ... the defendants, it would be necessary to bring suit in the ... name of such substituted trustee. Fant v. Brissey, ... 150 S.C. 15, 147 S.E. 632 ...          Hence, ... the order in the case at bar must be construed as having ... ...
  • Crews v. Garber
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 25 mars 1941
    ...fund lost by reason of the negligence of the directors may maintain an action against the directors for such loss. See Fant v. Brissey, 150 S.C. 15, 147 S.E. 632; Miller v. Howard, 95 Tenn. 407, 32 S.W. United Society of Shakers v. Underwood, 9 Bush, Ky., 609, 15 Am.Rep. 731. It is generall......
  • Winn v. Harby
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 13 novembre 1933
    ...do the officers and directors of a corporation become liable individually to one dealing with the corporation? In the case of Fant v. Brissey, supra, this court said: can be no controversy as to the proposition that a cause of action against the directors of a bank for losses to the bank, a......
  • Winn v. Harby
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 27 janvier 1931
    ... ... this court in the cases of Peruvian Guano Corporation v ... Thompson et al., 112 S.C. 377, 99 S.E. 808; Fant et ... al. v. Brissey et al., 150 S.C. 15, 147 S.E. 632; and ... Stewart et al. v. Ficken et al., 151 S.C. 424, 149 ... S.E. 164 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT