Farrar v. Christy's Adm'rs
Decision Date | 31 March 1857 |
Citation | 24 Mo. 453 |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Parties | FARRAR & SWERINGEN, Respondents, v. CHRISTY'S ADMINISTRATORS, Appellants.<sup>a1</sup> |
1. William Christy, being seized in fee of four lots in the city of St. Louis, by deed dated September, 1832--his wife, Martha T., joining in the conveyance--conveyed the same to their two sons, Edmund T. and Howard F. Christy; the lots were conveyed by separate metes and bounds, two lots to Edmund and two to Howard. The deed contained the following habendum: “To have and to hold the premises aforesaid, with all the appurtenances thereunto belonging, to them and their heirs forever, upon condition that should either of the grantees herein named die without leaving legal heirs of their body, the survivor shall inherit the whole of the property hereby conveyed; and should both grantees die without leaving legal heirs as aforesaid, the property hereby conveyed shall revert to the other legal heirs of the said William and Martha T.” Edmund T. Christy died in the year 1840, without leaving heirs of his body, he having never been married. After the death of Edmund, the heirs of William and Martha T. Christy, by deed dated October 7th, 1842, released to Howard F. Christy all their “right, title, interest, estate and expectancy” in and to the said four lots; this deed of release contained the following recital: “Which lots of land were held to said Edmund T. and Howard F., in the manner specified in said deed, with cross-remainder to the survivor, and also, on a certain contingency, with remainder to the heirs general of said William Christy and Martha T. Christy,” etc. Howard F. Christy executed a bond of even date with the above release in the penal sum of $3,000 to James T. Sweringen and Martha, his wife--the said Martha being one of the heirs of William and Martha T. Christy; the said bond contained the following condition: Howard F. Christy died in the year 1853, leaving a widow, but no heirs of the body.
Held, in a suit against Howard F. Christy's administrators to recover the value of the interest in said four lots (alleged to be one-sixth) that would have vested, but for the above release, in Mrs. Sweringen, at the death of Howard, without leaving heirs of his body.
1st. That, construing the deed of September 20th, 1832, with reference to the rules of the common law, Edmund T. Christy and Howard F. Christy would each have become seized in fee tail of the two lots granted to each respectively.
2d. That, by the operation of the act of February 14th, 1825 (R. C. 1825, p. 216), the estate's tail that would have vested, but for said act, in Edmund and Howard respectively, were cut down and destroyed, Edmund taking a life estate only in the two conveyed to him, and Howard a life estate only in the two lots conveyed to him; that a remainder in Edmund's two lots immediately passed in fee simple absolute to Howard (subject, however, to be divested by the birth of issue of Edmund); that a remainder in Howard's two lots passed in fee simple absolute to Edmund (subject to be divested by the birth of issue of Howard); that the remainder in Howard's two lots, which vested in fee simple absolute in Edmund, descended upon his (Edmund's) death to his heirs general, of whom Mrs. Sweringen was one.
3d. That, consequently, there was a good cause of action on said bond, inasmuch as the release above mentioned was effectual to transfer to Howard F. Christy an interest that had vested in Mrs. Sweringen in two of the four lots embraced in the deed of September 20th, 1832.
4th. That defendants were not estopped to deny that Mrs. Sweringen took an interest in said lots under the limitations of the deed of September 20th, 1832.
5th. That no recovery could be had beyond the penalty of the bond.
William Christy and Martha T. Christy, on the 20th of September, 1832, executed the following deed:
Edmund T. Christy died in the year 1840, without leaving heirs of his body. He was never married.
In the year 1842, doubts arising as to the construction to be given to the above deed, the other heirs of William and Martha T. Christy joined in the execution of the following deed of release, dated October 7th, 1842, to Howard F. Christy: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gannon v. Albright
...v. Burrill, 15 Pick. 104; Tate v. Tally, 3 Call (Va.) 355; Carter v. Tyler, 1 Call 165; Bells v. Gillespie, 5 Rand. 273; Farrar v. Christy, 24 Mo. 468; Harbison Swan, 58 Mo. 147; Thompson v. Craig, 64 Mo. 312; Emerson v. Hughes, 110 Mo. 627; Goodman v. Simmons, 113 Mo. 122; Bone v. Tyrrell,......
-
Gillilan v. Gillilan
...Chiles v. Bartleson, 21 Mo. 344; Phillips v. LaForge, 89 Mo. 72; Wood v. Kice, 103 Mo. 329; Emmerson v. Hughes, 110 Mo. 627; Farrar v. Christy's Admrs., 24 Mo. 468; Bone v. Tyrell, 113 Mo. 175; Godman Simmons, 113 Mo. 127; Clarkson v. Clarkson, 125 Mo. 385; Hunter v. Patterson, 142 Mo. 310;......
-
Elsea v. Smith
...estate tail, but by the uniform decisions of the courts are conserved and enforced as if limited after any other life estate. Farrar v. Christy, 24 Mo. 453, 470; Harbison v. Swan, 58 Mo. 153 (under statute 1825); Wood v. Kice, 103 Mo. 329; Cox v. Jones, 229 Mo. 53 (under statute 1865, the p......
-
Johnson v. Calvert
... ... estate, commencing with the case of Farrar v ... Christy, 24 Mo. 453, down through many cases, not ... necessary to be cited here, to ... ...