Farris v. Thompson
Decision Date | 03 February 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 6398.,6398. |
Citation | 168 S.W.2d 439 |
Parties | FARRIS v. THOMPSON. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Newton County; Emory Smith, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by Mrs. R. C. Farris against Guy A. Thompson, trustee of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff's husband, Dr. R. C. Farris. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Thos. J. Cole, of St. Louis, Leo H. Johnson, of Neosho, and McReynolds & Flanigan, of Carthage, for appellant.
H. A. Gardner, of Monett, and Frank Mattes, of Jefferson City, for respondent.
This is an action brought by the widow of Dr. R. C. Farris against Guy A. Thompson, Trustee of the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, for the death of Dr. Farris. The case was first tried February 9, 1942, resulting in a failure of the jury to agree upon a verdict. The second trial started on June 9, 1942, and on June 10, 1942, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $2,250 and judgment for said amount was entered. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled, and an appeal was had to this court.
The amended petition in this case alleged that Guy A. Thompson was the duly appointed, qualified and acting trustee for the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, and was operating a passenger train between Kansas City and St. Louis and which train passed through the town of Clarksburg in Moniteau County, Missouri, and that the line of railroad runs in a general east and west direction through the town of Clarksburg, that at a point approximately 300 feet west of the depot in said town the railroad track is crossed by a north and south public street or highway, much used by the public, and is known as West Street.
A part of the amended petition is as follows:
The answer to the amended petition admits that Guy A. Thompson is the trustee of the Railroad Corporation, and in charge of all the lines of railroad of said company including the one mentioned in plaintiff's petition. We quote the remainder of the answer as follows:
The defendant filed a reply to the answer denying each and every allegation of new matter therein contained, and denying specifically that the deceased, Dr. Farris, was guilty of negligence which contributed to his death.
As said above, after judgment an appeal was had to this court, and the case is presented to us under three assignments of error. The first of these is that the court erred in refusing the demurrers requested at the close of plaintiff's evidence and again at the close of all the evidence.
This requires a consideration of the facts in the case, and the law applicable to such facts.
The first witness for the plaintiff was Frank Winebrenner, who testified that he had lived in and around Clarksburg all his life; that he worked at the Farmer's Elevator. The railroad tracks run east and west through the town; it divides the town pretty well into a north and south side, both schools are on the south side and the church and business block on the north side; there are three railroad tracks through the town, a central main track upon which the train was running, a south track sided to the elevator, where this witness worked, and a north track sided to the stockyards. There is a road between the tracks and the business block and this is known as State Street and runs parallel with the railroad track. There is a street running north and south crossing the railroad tracks and known as West Street. Along the west side of this street is a concrete or asphalt walk, which crosses the railroad tracks, and it was upon this walk that Dr. Farris was supposed to be traveling south. The depot was about 300 feet to the east of this crossing upon which Dr. Farris was killed on February 18 1940. It was snowing at the time he was killed and the wind was blowing from the west, the general direction from which the train was coming. This witness said he lived on State Street two blocks (about 1,000 feet) from the street upon which Dr. Farris was killed. He drove in his car from his home up town towards his place of work and the train passed him about the center of the first block, about 200 feet from his home, up towards West Street, and that he did not hear the whistle blow or the bell ring. The windows of his car were all up but one, it had a piece of glass broken out on the left hand side, and the train was passing on his right hand side, somewhere near seventy-five or eighty feet south of him. He testified that there are two distinct roads crossing the railroad; West Street road, upon which Dr. Farris was walking south, and another road known as State Highway M. The elevator building at which he was working separates these two roads. There was a wigwag signal three or four feet from the main line and in the space between the State Highway M and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nolan v. Joplin Transfer & Storage Co.
... ... Pevely Dairy Co., 148 ... S.W.2d 61, 62, 235 Mo.App. 1036; O'Donnell v ... Patton, 117 Mo. 13, 21, 22 S.W. 903; Farris v ... Thompson (Mo. App.), 168 S.W.2d 439, 443, 444; Dowler v ... Kurn et al. (Mo. App.), 119 S.W.2d 852, 856, 857; ... Russell v. Johnson, ... ...
-
Shelton v. Thompson
... ... Co., 152 Mo.App. 468; Hamilton v. Railroad Co., ... 250 Mo. 714; Bohring v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., ... 194 Mo. 511; Schmidt v. Railroad Co., 191 Mo. 215; ... Reno v. St. L. & S. Ry. Co., 180 Mo. 469; Wolf ... v. Wabash R. Co., 212 Mo.App. 26, 251 S.W. 441; ... Farris v. Thompson, 68 S.W.2d 469; Hendrick v ... Kurn, 179 S.W.2d 717. (5) A pedestrian, like anybody ... else going upon a railroad crossing, must exercise ordinary ... care to look and listen for the approach of trains. If a ... plaintiff fails to exercise such care and if his negligence ... ...
-
Stokes v. Wabash R. Co.
... ... Ry. Co., 252 Mo. 525, 160 S.W. 994; Burge v. Wabash ... Ry. Co., 244 Mo. 76, 148 S.W. 925; Costello v ... Pitcairn, 116 S.W.2d 257; Farris v. Thompson, ... 168 S.W.2d 439; Dyrcz v. Mo. Pac. Ry., 238 Mo. 33, ... 141 S.W. 861. (4) Plaintiff's Instruction 1 was erroneous ... because ... ...
-
Wilson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
...Mo. 743, 117 S.W.2d 296; Mahl v. Terrell, 342 Mo. 15, 111 S.W.2d 160; Bates v. Brown Shoe Co., 342 Mo. 411, 116 S.W.2d l.c. 34; Farris v. Thompson, 168 S.W.2d 439. Plaintiff failed to make a submissible case on injuries. (3) Instruction 1 erroneously submitted the cause to the jury on the h......