Farris v. Union Cent. Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 08 April 1919 |
Docket Number | 9598. |
Citation | 179 P. 919,72 Okla. 220,1919 OK 105 |
Parties | FARRIS et al. v. UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
Lands allotted to an enrolled Choctaw freedman under the Atoka Agreement embodied in Act Cong. June 28, 1898, in pursuance of provisions of the Treaty of July 10, 1866, and Act of Choctaw Council of May 21, 1883, and which lands were to be nontaxable for a period of 21 years, or while the title remained in the original allottee, are exempt from state taxation. The allottee acquired vested rights of exemption from taxation, which were not abrogated by Act Cong. May 27 1908, removing restrictions upon alienation and providing that the lands from which restrictions were removed should be subject to taxation.
Error from District Court, Garvin County; F. B. Swank, Judge.
Action by the Union Central Life Insurance Company against Joe Farris and another to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Reversed.
John A McClure, of Sulphur, and Albert Rennie, of Pauls Valley, for plaintiffs in error.
J. B Dudley, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
On the 21st of May, 1916, the defendant in error commenced this action in the district court of Garvin county to foreclose a mortgage executed by the plaintiff in error, Joe Farris, then a single man, to secure a loan of $350, evidenced by promissory note. At the time the action was filed, there was no sum for principal or interest past due on the note. The sole ground alleged in the petition was that the maker had defaulted in not paying taxes levied and assessed against the mortgaged property for the years 1909 to 1915, inclusive. The mortgage contained the provision that, in the event the mortgagor failed to pay taxes assessed for any year, then the mortgagee would have the right to foreclose. The cause was submitted to the court below upon the note and mortgage, and upon an agreed statement of facts. For a better understanding of the issue presented in this case, it will be necessary to refer briefly to certain treaties and agreements between the United States and the Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribes of Indians.
Prior to the Proclamation of Emancipation, African slavery existed in the Choctaw Nation. The majority of the Choctaws had sided with the Southern Confederacy in the war between the states. After peace was declared between the North and the South, there was still some bitterness existing in the tribe. In 1865, commissioners, representing the United States, met with delegates from the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations at Ft. Smith, Ark., and entered into a treaty which was duly ratified and proclaimed July 10, 1866 (14 Stat. L. 769), and, among other things, provided:
On May 21, 1883, the Choctaw Council, for the purpose of carrying into effect the conditions and provisions of the above act, passed a law conferring upon the Choctaw freedmen all the rights, privileges, and immunities belonging to citizens of the Choctaw Nation. Sections 1, 2, and 3 of the Act of the Choctaw Council, supra, are as follows:
On the 23d of April, 1897, there was made between the United States and the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations what is known as the Atoka Agreement, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial