Fasano v. State, 88-1840

Decision Date27 September 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-1840,88-1840
Citation14 Fla. L. Weekly 2241,548 So.2d 1191
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2241 Vincent James FASANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Arthur Massey and Arthur Tifford, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

At oral argument we requested a supplement to the record to include the closing argument of counsel. Appellant claimed that the co-representation of himself and his codefendant brother by trial counsel deprived him of effective counsel. Although ineffectiveness claims generally may not be raised on direct appeal, where the facts giving rise to the claim of conflict of interest or prejudice to the defendant are apparent on the face of the record, they may be considered. Gordon v. State, 469 So.2d 795, 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Having read the transcript and the supplement provided, we cannot conclude that appellant presented such a conflict on the face of the record, especially where he concedes he did not object to the corepresentation, and both brothers were acquitted of the three crimes with which they were both charged.

Finding no error in the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal on the marijuana possession charge and harmless error in the admission of irrelevant evidence, we affirm the conviction and sentence.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Harris v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 1991
    ...denied, 460 U.S. 1103, 103 S.Ct. 1802, 76 L.Ed.2d 366 (1983); Michutka v. State, 506 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gordon v. State, 469 So.2d 795 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 480 So.2d 1296 (Fla.1985). Furthermore, as the court pointed out......
  • Tarawneh v. State, 88-2191
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1990
    ...Appellants assert that this issue should be considered on direct appeal because the prejudice is apparent. See Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). But see Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). They maintain tha......
  • Loren v. State, 91-1600
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 5, 1992
    ...exception arises when the record below is sufficient to allow determination of an effectiveness claim. For example, in Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), the court concluded that an effectiveness claim based on dual representation of codefendants during the same trial coul......
  • Thompson v. State, 99-1183.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 1999
    ...proposition. See Loren v. State, 601 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Lynn v. State, 567 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Under present statutory law, an appeal may not be taken in a criminal case "unless a prejudicial error is alleged and i......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT