Faulkner v. State
Decision Date | 17 May 1928 |
Docket Number | 6497. |
Citation | 144 S.E. 193,166 Ga. 645 |
Parties | FAULKNER v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1928.
Syllabus by the Court.
Where the deceased was shot by the defendant on Thursday night, one ball entering his left arm and shattering the bone of this arm, and another ball entering the left leg and shattering the long bone in his thigh, and where the deceased died from the result of these wounds at 1:30 a. m. on the following Wednesday, the trial judge did not err in admitting as a dying declaration his statement as to the cause of his death and the person who killed him, made on the day following the one on which he was shot, the deceased stating that he felt that he would not recover, and that, if anything happened, he wanted to give an account of the manner in which he was shot by the defendant, notwithstanding the fact that his medical attendants did not consider him in a serious condition until the following Tuesday, when they discovered that he was infected with blood-poisoning; the objection to the admission of such statement being that the preliminary proof failed to show that the deceased was conscious of his condition.
The trial judge did not err in giving to the jury the instruction dealt with in the second division of the opinion, upon the ground of exception urged thereto.
An erroneous instruction upon a theory of defense, not authorized by the evidence, does not require the grant of a new trial.
The trial judge did not err in giving to the jury the instruction dealt with in the fourth division of the opinion.
The court below did not err in failing to instruct the jury that under the evidence the arrest of the defendant was illegal.
Where a defendant was indicted and tried for the murder of a policeman, and separately indicted for an assault with intent to murder another policeman, both offenses growing out of the same transaction, a ruling by the trial judge that the relatives of the latter policeman were competent jurors to try the defendant for the murder of the policeman who was killed, even if erroneous (on which we pass no judgment) does not require the grant of a new trial, it not being made to appear that any relative of the living policeman served upon the jury who tried the defendant, or that the defendant was compelled to exhaust his peremptory challenges in getting rid of such relatives, for which reason he could not challenge other objectionable jurors, or that the state was in any way benefited by such ruling.
The questions propounded by the court to a witness, and set forth in the tenth ground of the motion for new trial, did not amount to an expression of an opinion upon the evidence.
The verdict is supported by the evidence.
Error from Superior Court, Walton County; Blanton Fortson, Judge.
Oscar Faulkner was convicted of murder, and he brings error. Affirmed.
Charge that if defendant shot at another and hit deceased same law would apply as though third person was shot held proper under evidence concerning justifiable homicide.
Oscar Faulkner was indicted and tried for the murder of Erastus Moon. The jury returned a verdict of guilty with a recommendation. The evidence of the witness who were sworn on the trial was substantially as follows:
W. J Mayfield:
He and Moon, who were policemen, were called by the defendant to go down to a filling station in the city of Monroe. They found that there had been a collision between the automobile of the defendant and that of one Collins. Those two could not agree as to who was at fault, and called Mayfield and Moon to straighten it out. Moon told the defendant that it was not their business to settle this dispute. The defendant cursed Collins, and told him that if he did not fix his car he was a d_____ s_____ of a b_____. The policemen kept them apart. Moon put the defendant under arrest for cursing and being drunk and disorderly, and placed him in charge of Mayfield. Moon put the defendant in the car of Mayfield. The defendant asked Moon what was to become of his wife and children, who were with him in his car when the collision occurred. Moon said to defendant's wife, "Get your things out of the car there and the children, and we will drive by and leave you there at the house." When they reached his home, the defendant opened the car door. Moon said to him, "You stay in the car." The defendant mumbled that he would be damned if he went anywhere. Mayfield opened the door and went around the front end of the car. Moon had got out on the right-hand side of the car. Just as Mayfield got at the front wheels he heard the defendant's pistol snap. The defendant stepped up on his porch and said, "I have got one of the damned bullies, and that is my part." When Mayfield reached for his pistol, defendant was shooting Moon. He shot four times altogether, twice at Mayfield and twice at Moon.
A. S. Williamson:
Dr. H. B. Nunnally:
Witness did not become alarmed over the condition of the deceased until some time before 11 o'clock on Tuesday night. His temperature was...
To continue reading
Request your trial