Fearn v. State
Decision Date | 07 April 1921 |
Docket Number | 8 Div. 324 |
Citation | 205 Ala. 478,88 So. 591 |
Parties | FEARN v. STATE ex rel. ALMON. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Robt. C. Brickell, Judge.
Petition by the State of Alabama, on the relation of D.C. Almon against Percy Fearn to condemn an automobile because used to transport illegal liquor, wherein Henry Fearn claimed the automobile. From decree of condemnation, claimant appeals. Affirmed.
Douglass Taylor, of Huntsville, for appellant.
J.Q Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.
This is a proceeding by the state, through its solicitor, to have condemned one five-passenger Ford touring car as the property of Percy Fearn, because used by him for the unlawful transportation of whisky.
Percy Fearn's father, Henry Fearn, propounds his claims averring that he owns the automobile, and that it was used without his knowledge or consent for the unlawful purpose and that he had no knowledge of facts that would or did put him on notice or inquiry that it was so used.
The evidence shows that defendant was running a public taxicab with this automobile in his own name in Huntsville, Ala., in August, 1919. During that month the defendant and Nelson Lackey drove this car from Huntsville to the residence of Dave Hawk, in Madison county, Ala., in the night, and sold him two automobile tires for $50, and received in payment therefor $10 in cash and two gallons of corn whisky. The whisky was placed in this car. They drank some of it, and brought the balance in the car over the public road to Huntsville, Ala. The two automobile tires were stolen. They were afterwards identified as having been stolen from the store of C.E. Wise in Huntsville. Nelson Lackey, who was with the defendant when they sold the tires to Dave Hawk, has been indicted for stealing them.
The defendant, Percy Fearn, did not testify in the case. His father, Henry Fearn, the claimant, testified that he purchased the car for $400 from Joseph Feger--$350 cash and note for $50 payable in 30 days. Receipt for $350 from Feger and note for $50 to Feger were introduced in evidence. The note was paid. Joseph Feger did not testify.
On direct examination claimant stated:
On cross-examination he said:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Edwards v. State
... ... So. 389; State v. Hughes, 203 Ala. 90, 82 So. 104; ... Maples v. State, 203 Ala. 153, 82 So. 183; ... Glover v. State, 205 Ala. 446, 88 So. 437; Byles ... v. State, 205 Ala. 286, 87 So. 856; Bowling v ... State, 204 Ala. 405, 85 So. 435; Echl v. State ... 205 Ala. 466, 88 So. 567; Fearn v. State, 205 Ala ... 478, 88 So. 591; Briscoe v. State, 204 Ala. 231, 85 ... The ... foregoing rule is recognized and given application in the ... above-cited cases. Under this rule if the vendor or mortgagee ... has no notice or knowledge that the vehicle is to be used for ... any ... ...
-
Commercial Credit Co. v. State
... ... 506, 84 So. 297; ... Bowling v. State, 204 Ala. 405, 85 So. 500; ... Briscoe Motor Car Co. v. State, 204 Ala. 231, 85 So ... 475; One Packard Automobile v. State, 204 Ala. 435, ... 86 So. 21; Glover v. State, 205 Ala. 446, 88 So ... 437; Eckl v. State, 205 Ala. 466, 88 So. 567; ... Fearn v. State ex rel. Almon, 205 Ala. 478, 88 So ... 591; Cherry-Ellington Auto Co. v. State ex rel ... Sarrell, 210 Ala. 469, 88 So. 389; May v ... State, 211 Ala. 449, 100 So. 780; Equitable Credit ... Co. v. State ex rel. Perry [Ala.Sup.] 102 So. 802), ... still, reputation of the sort here ... ...