Federal Chemical Co. v. Farmers Produce Exchange, 5927.
Decision Date | 05 July 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 5927.,5927. |
Citation | 118 S.W.2d 1067 |
Parties | FEDERAL CHEMICAL CO. v. FARMERS PRODUCE EXCHANGE. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Phelps County; W. E. Barton, Judge.
"Not to be published in State Reports."
Action by the Federal Chemical Company, a corporation, doing business as the Floyd Plant Food Company, against the Farmers Produce Exchange to enforce defendant's liability as indorser and guarantor on seventy-eight promissory notes. From a judgment for the defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
T. Victor Jeffries and W. I. Mayfield, both of Lebanon, for appellant.
Breuer & Northern, of Rolla, and Bradshaw & Fields, of Lebanon, for respondent.
This cause originated in the circuit court of Laclede county by plaintiff filing a petition the purpose of which was to enforce defendant's liability as endorser and guarantor on seventy-eight promissory notes aggregating $1,976.79 principal, and interest in the amount of $813.30. Defendant filed its answer consisting of a general denial, and an affirmative defense, to which plaintiff filed its reply. The venue in said cause was changed to the circuit court of Phelps county where the cause was tried at the regular September, 1937, term of said court resulting in a judgment on a verdict of a jury in favor of defendant, from which judgment plaintiff has appealed to this court.
At the threshold we are confronted with defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no affidavit was made as required by Section 1020, R.S.Mo.1929, page 1295, § 1020, Mo.Ann.Stat. The purported affidavit in the cause is as follows:
The motion rests upon the fact that the jurat is not signed by the clerk or other officer and was not sworn to as required by the mandatory provisions of the section of law above cited. In support of the motion four affidavits are attached thereto made by the circuit clerk and deputy circuit clerk of Laclede county and by the circuit clerk and deputy circuit clerk of Phelps county respectively. In three of the affidavits it is stated positively by affiant that neither did the appellant nor did any agent for the appellant at any time appear before affiant and "be sworn to the so-called affidavit or any other affidavit for appeal in the above mentioned proceedings." The affidavit of H. B. Perry, deputy circuit clerk of Phelps county, among other things, stated:
In opposition to the motion plaintiff filed two affidavits, one by T. Victor Jeffries, who signed the purported affidavit for appeal, and another by H. B. Perry, deputy circuit clerk of Phelps county. The affidavit of T. Victor Jeffries, among other things, stated: "that the said deputy clerk was sitting at his desk in the court room at the time, and accepted said affidavit from this affiant and went through all the formalities to constitute a swearing to an affidavit, and the affiant says, he did in fact swear to said affidavit." The affidavit of H. B. Perry, among other things, stated: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. McDowell
... ... 319; Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical ... Co., 263 Mo. 719, 173 S.W. 674; Bealmer v ... 299; Federal ... Chemical Co. v. Farmers Produce Exchange, ... ...
-
In re Phillips' Estate
... ... the circuit court. Federal Chemical Co. v. Farmers ... Produce Exchange, ... ...
-
Miller v. Palo Alto Bd. of Sup'rs, 49150
...the commissioners signed at the request and in the presence of the sheriff and that they were not sworn. In Federal Chemical Co. v. Farmers Produce Exchange, Mo.App., 118 S.W.2d 1067, the signed instrument with blank jurat was filed with the deputy clerk who stated he failed by oversight to......
- Winkler v. Kurn