Federal Reserve Bank v. Millspaugh
Decision Date | 09 April 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 26626.,26626. |
Citation | 282 S.W. 706 |
Parties | FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS v. MILLSPAUGH, State Finance Com'r. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Scott County; Frank Kelly, Judge.
Suit by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis against Frank C. Millspaugh, Finance Commissioner. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Springfield Court of Appeals, and the case certified to the Supreme Court (275 S. W. 583). Affirmed.
Bailey & Bailey, of Sikeston, for appellant. James G. McConkey, of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is a suit brought by the respondent in the circuit court of Scott county against the appellant as finance commissioner of the state of Missouri in charge of the Bank of Oran, which failed and is now in process of liquidation.
The purpose of the action was to have certain funds in the hands of the commissioner in charge of the assets of the bank declared to be entitled to a preference over the claims of general creditors.
The case was tried to the court upon an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff's claim was declared to be preferential and was allowed and judgment rendered in its favor against the Bank of Oran, now in process of liquidation and in charge of the appellant, the finance commissioner. From this judgment he appeals.
The agreed statement of facts, upon which the case was tried, is as follows:
Signed by the counsel of the respective parties hereto.
That a clearer understanding may be more readily had of the matter at issue an epitome of the foregoing facts is stated as follows:
The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis forwarded to the Bank of Oran its cash letter containing items aggregating $2,392.59, to be remitted for in cash or in St. Louis exchange. The items were received by the Bank of Oran, and the latter collected the same from the several drawers against their respective deposits, and, in the case of drafts drawn against its depositors by the acceptance of the depositor's checks and the charging of the check against his deposits. The Bank of Oran attempted to forward the collections thus made by drawing its drafts on the First National Bank in St. Louis in favor of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis for the proceeds thus collected and forwarded the drafts to the Federal Reserve Bank. The latter presented said drafts to the First National Bank for payment,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Leach v. Mechanics' Savings Bank
... ... Satterlee, 81 Iowa ... 491, 46 N.W. 1102); and to a trustee in bankruptcy in Federal ... court ( Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S ... 415, 51 L.Ed. 1117, 27 S.Ct. 720; ... equitable assignment, see Federal Reserve Bank of St ... Louis v. Millspaugh (Mo.), 282 S.W. 706; Federal ... Reserve Bank v. [202 Iowa ... ...
-
National City Bank of St. Louis v. Macon Creamery Co.
... ... and agent, and not that of debtor and creditor, is created ... Federal Reserve Bank v. Millspaugh, 282 S.W. 706; ... Federal Reserve Bank v. Quigley, 284 S.W. 164; ... ...
-
First State Bank of Bristow v. O'bannon
...and agent, and the funds so transmitted are impressed with a trust by reason of the intention of the parties Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis v. Millspaugh (Mo.) 282 S.W. 706; Bank of America v. Waydell, 187 N.Y. 115, 79 N.E. 857; In re Bank of Cuba in N.Y., 191 N.Y.S. 88; National Life In......
-
Leach v. Mechanics' Sav. Bank
...as between the parties, the drawing and delivery of a draft to the payee is an equitable assignment, see Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis v. Millspaugh (Mo. Sup.) 282 S. W. 706;Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Peters, 139 Va. 45, 123 S. E. 379, 42 A. L. R. 742;Raesser v. Nat. Exchange B......