Feldmeier v. Webster
| Decision Date | 21 March 1956 |
| Citation | 150 N.Y.S.2d 581,1 A.D.2d 938 |
| Parties | Robert H. FELDMEIER, as a Stockholder of Sanitary Processing Equipment Corporation, Respondent, v. Eric WEBSTER, Sanitary Processing Equipment Corporation and Eastern Dairy Equipment Co., Inc., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Harry L. Marcus, Brooklyn (Herbert L. Maltinsky, Brooklyn, of counsel), for appellants.
Gray, Norem, Van Lengen & Van Lengen, Syracuse (George Van Lengen, Syracuse, of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, 208 Misc. 996, 145 N.Y.S.2d 365, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Onondaga Special Term, Sullivan, J., denying defendants' motion for a change of venue from Onondaga County to Queens County, in a stockholder's action.)
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Blum v. Gleitsman
... ... For the purpose of venue the residence of a stockholder in a derivation action is controlling (Feldmeier v. Webster, 208 Misc. 996, 145 N.Y.S.2d 365, affirmed 1 A.D.2d 938, 150 N.Y.S.2d 581). Defendants rely [25 Misc.2d 743] on Tenney v. Rosenthal, 6 ... ...
-
Tashenberg v. Breslin
...county of residence is proper for purposes of venue (CPLR 503, subd. Feldmeier v. Webster, 208 Misc. 996, 145 N.Y.S.2d 365, affd. 1 A.D.2d 938, 150 N.Y.S.2d 581; Blum v. Gleitsman, 25 Misc.2d 740, 203 N.Y.S.2d 38). Accordingly, since this matter involves a joinder of claims with conflicting......