Feldstein v. Board of Registration in Medicine

Citation387 Mass. 339,439 N.E.2d 824
PartiesRobert W. FELDSTEIN v. BOARD OF REGISTRATION IN MEDICINE.
Decision Date31 August 1982
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Joel Z. Eigerman, Boston, for plaintiff.

Leah S. Crothers, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Ellen L. Janos, Asst. Atty. Gen., with her), for defendant.

Before HENNESSEY, C. J., and WILKINS, NOLAN, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.

NOLAN, Justice.

The narrow issue posed in this case is whether the defendant Board of Registration in Medicine (Board) abused its discretion in revoking Robert W. Feldstein's license to practice medicine, after Feldstein pleaded guilty to ten counts of making false representations to the Department of Public Welfare for the purpose of extracting payments under the Medicaid program. There was no error.

From findings of fact made by the Board, we learn that Feldstein was born in Cairo, Egypt, and attended medical school in Lyons, France. He came to the United States in 1958 and passed his board examinations in general medicine in 1961. He was employed as a physician at Metropolitan State Hospital between 1961 and 1979. He started developing a private practice about 1966, and it consisted almost entirely of treatment of nursing home patients. On November 14, 1979, he was indicted in ten counts under G.L. c. 18, § 5B, for making false representations to the Department of Public Welfare, in order to procure payments under the Medicaid program. These violations are sometimes characterized as "double billing." He was also indicted for larceny under G.L. c. 266, § 30. To the indictment charging violations of G.L. c. 18, § 5B, which are misdemeanors, he pleaded guilty. He was given a one-year suspended sentence to a house of correction, fined $5,000, and placed on probation for two years. The case involving the indictment for larceny, to which he entered a plea of not guilty, was continued without a finding for eighteen months on oral motion of the Commonwealth, and he was ordered to make restitution in the amount of $2,200 to the Department of Public Welfare.

As a result of his criminal conviction the Board, on February 5, 1981, served on Feldstein a notice to show cause why his license should not be revoked. The matter was referred to a hearing officer who filed a decision in which she recommended no further sanctions. The Board did not accept such recommendation and on November 18, 1981, issued an order revoking Feldstein's license to practice medicine in Massachusetts. Feldstein then filed a complaint in the Superior Court for judicial review of the Board's action under G.L. c. 30A, § 14. 1 A petition under G.L. c. 211, § 4A, to transfer the case to the county court was allowed, and on a joint motion a single justice of this court reserved and reported to the full court Feldstein's petition for judicial review and the issues raised therein.

Feldstein's arguments can be fairly summarized in the proposition that the Board abused its discretion in revoking his license because the hearing officer recommended no further sanctions, and because his convictions did not show him to be a danger to the public health, safety, and welfare in his practice of medicine.

The Board has the authority to revoke, suspend, or cancel the certificate of registration of a physician who "has been convicted of a criminal offense which reasonably calls into question his ability to practice medicine." G.L. c. 112, § 5(g ), as appearing in St. 1977, c. 165. In Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in Medicine, 378 Mass. 519, 392 N.E.2d 1036 (1979), the court held that the Board had authority to revoke the license,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Luk v. Com.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • November 27, 1995
    ...of a physician's license is considered to be remedial under the double jeopardy clause"); Feldstein v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 387 Mass. 339, 341-342, 439 N.E.2d 824 (1982); Arthurs v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 383 Mass. 299, 316-317, 418 N.E.2d 1236 (1981). See also Peo......
  • Bettencourt v. Board of Registration In Medicine of Com. of Mass.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • March 8, 1990
    ...Sec. 1.05(2). In choosing a sanction, the Board is not bound by the hearing officer's recommendation. See Feldstein v. Board of Registration, 387 Mass. 339, 439 N.E.2d 824, 826 (1982). A physician who is unsatisfied with the Board's decision may petition directly to the Massachusetts Suprem......
  • Wang v. Board of Registration in Medicine
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • May 4, 1989
    ...two unregistered submachine guns called into question physician's ability to practice medicine); Feldstein v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 387 Mass. 339, 340-341, 439 N.E.2d 824 (1982) (conviction of make false representations to Department of Public Welfare, i.e., "double billing"); ......
  • Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • August 11, 2005
    ...of Medicaid fraud, which reasonably called into question his ability to practice medicine. See Feldstein v. Board of Registration in Med., 387 Mass. 339, 341, 439 N.E.2d 824 (1982) (conviction of Medicaid fraud reflects on ability to practice medicine); Levy v. Board of Registration & Disci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT