Fell v. McCready

Decision Date15 December 1933
Citation189 N.E. 718,263 N.Y. 602
PartiesJoseph P. FELL, as Administrator with the Will Annexed of Lilla B. McCready, Deceased, Appellant and Respondent, v. Ira T. McCREADY et al., Respondents and Appellants. Lola L. BUTLER et al., Appellants and Respondents, v. Benjamin F. ADAMS et al., Respondents and Appellants.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Cross-appeals in the first above-entitled action from a judgment, entered April 12, 1933, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department (236 App. Div. 390, 259 N. Y. S. 512), reversing upon the law a judgment entered upon the report of a referee and directing a dismissal of the complaint, on the ground that a decree had been rendered in a prior action between the same parties involving the same subject-matter.

Cross-appeals in the second above-entitled action from a judgment of the Apellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered April 12, 1933, modifying and affirming as modified upon new findings, a judgment entered upon the report of a referee.

The first above-entitled action was brought by the administrator with the will annexed of Lilla B. McCready, deceased, for a voluntary accounting as to the corpus only of the estate of Riley W. McCready, deceased, claiming all accumulated income, including stock dividends and certain real estate of which Riley W. McCready died seized, as the individual property of Lilla B. McCready, and asking the direction of the court as to what disposition should be made of such corpus and to whom it should be distributed, and also asking for the discharge of the plaintiff from further liability for the estate of Riley W. McCready, deceased.

The second above-entitled action was for the construction of the will of Riley W. McCready, deceased, for a determination of the persons entitled to share in his residuary estate and in the accretions thereto and accumulated income thereof, and for an accounting by Joseph P. Fell (plaintiff in the first above-entitled action), individually and as administrator with the will annexed of Lilla B. McCready, of such residue, accretions, and accumulated income, and of the administration and use thereof by Lilla B. McCready, deceased, in her lifetime, and for the distribution thereof to the persons entitled thereto.

By his will, testator gave the residue of his estate to his wife with full power to invest and reinvest the same in such securities as to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Morgan Guaranty Trust Co., In re
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 7, 1971
    ...Gifford, 279 N.Y. 470, 474--475, 18 N.E.2d 663, 664--665; Fell v. McCready, 236 App.Div. 390, 394, 259 N.Y.S. 512, 517--518, affd. 263 N.Y. 602, 189 N.E. 718; see, also, Restatement, Second, Conflict of Laws, Proposed Official Draft (1969), §§ 263--264, pp. 154--160.) Since Acheson was domi......
  • Dow's Estate, In re
    • United States
    • New York Surrogate Court
    • April 14, 1975
    ...499; Matter of Fabbri, 2 N.Y.2d 236, 159 N.Y.S.2d 184, 140 N.E.2d 269; Fell v. McCready, 236 App.Div. 390, 259 N.Y.S. 512, affd. 263 N.Y. 602, 189 N.E. 718. If, however, a non-domiciliary testator provides in his will that the disposition of his property situated in New York shall be govern......
  • Estate of Shannon, Matter of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 29, 1985
    ..."be permitted to defeat the expressed intention of the testator" (Fell v. McCready, 236 App.Div. 390, 395, 259 N.Y.S. 512, affd. 263 N.Y. 602, 189 N.E. 718; Matter of James, 146 N.Y. 78, 100-101, 40 N.E. 876). Although the words "heirs and assigns" have been construed to be words of limitat......
  • Matter of Stephan
    • United States
    • New York Surrogate Court
    • June 26, 1950
    ...must be read as a whole and the different provisions reconciled and harmonized if possible (Fell v. McCready, 236 App. Div. 390, affd. 263 N.Y. 602). The intent must be gathered from the whole will with context and cognate gifts shedding light upon the meaning (Matter of Evans, 234 N.Y. 42)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT