Fellers v. Anco Sales Co.
Decision Date | 02 September 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 13547,13547 |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Parties | Richard FELLERS, Appellant, v. ANCO SALES COMPANY et al., Appellees. |
Stafford & Alcorn, Glusing & Sharpe, Kingsville, Wm. L. Ellis, Aransas Pass, Oscar Spitz, Corpus Christi, for appellant.
North, Blackmon & White, Corpus Christi, for appellees.
Appellant on August 14, 1959, filed Motion No. 19561 herein asking for an extension of time within which to file the statement of facts in this cause. The motion is not verified, and does not show on what date the judgment was rendered, or whether or not a motion for a new trial was filed. It does not show the date upon which the sixty-day period allowed by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, for the filing of the record will expire. It does not show that appellant complied with Rule 376, T.R.C.P., in that it does not show that appellant delivered or mailed to appellees or their attorneys a copy of his letter to the District Clerk requesting a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court. Neither does appellant show that he complied with the provisions of Rule 377, subsection (c), reading as follows:
The motion is not supported by the affidavit of the court reporter to the effect that he was unable to prepare the statement of facts within the sixty days allowed by Rule 386, supra, because of other official business. Appellant's motion fails to show on its face that good cause existed why the statement of facts could not have been prepared and filed in the trial court within the fifty-day period allowed by Rule 381, T.R.C.P., and in this Court within the sixty-day period allowed by Rule 386, supra. The motion therefore is overruled. Matlock v. Matlock, 151 Tex. 308, 249 S.W.2d 587; Gonzalez v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 154 Tex. 118, 274 S.W.2d 537; Rule 389-a,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rehkopf v. Texarkana Newspapers, Inc.
...Tex.Civ.App., 348 S.W.2d 414, n.w.h.; Dellerman v. Trager, Tex.Civ.App., 1959, 327 S.W.2d 667, err. dism.; Fellers v. Anco Sales Company, Tex.Civ.App., 1959, 327 S.W.2d 797; Ortiz v. Associated Employers Lloyds, Tex.Civ.App., 1956, 294 S.W.2d 880, n.w .h.; Jaye v. Texas Consolidated Oils, T......
-
Hill Chemicals Company v. Miller
...Watson v. Jones, 348 S.W.2d 414, n.w.h.; Dellerman v. Trager, Tex.Civ.App., 1959, 327 S.W.2d 667, err. dism.; Fellers v. Anco Sales Company, Tex.Civ.App., 1959, 327 S.W.2d 797; Ortiz v. Associated Employers Lloyds, Tex.Civ.App., 1956, 294 N.W.2d 880, n.w.h.; Jaye v. Texas Consolidated Oils,......
-
Bly v. Harvey
...the cause or, an order requiring the statement of facts to have been filed as part of the record in the case. Fellers v. Anco Sales Company (Tex.Civ.App., 1959) 327 S.W.2d 797; First National Bank of Bryan v. Roberts (Tex.Civ.App., 1955) 280 S.W.2d 788, W.R., N.R.E. The trial court was appa......
-
Hodges v. Central Bank & Trust Company, 8006
...Tex.Civ .App.,348 S.W.2d 414, n.w.h.; Dellerman v. Trager, Tex.Civ.App., 1969, 327 S.W.2d 667, err. dism.; Fellers v. Anco Sales Company, Tex .Civ.App., 1959,327 S.W.2d 797; Ortiz v. Associated Employers Lloyds, Tex.Civ.App., 1956,294 S.W.2d 880, n.w.h.; Jaye v. Texas Consolidated Oils, Tex......