Fenwick v. Gill

Decision Date31 October 1863
CitationFenwick v. Gill, 34 Mo. 194 (Mo. 1863)
PartiesJAMES G. W. FENWICK, Respondent, v. NAPOLEON B. GILL, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

Tuttle & Rozier, and Glover & Shepley, for respondent.

Casselberry, for appellant.

BATES, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of ejectment for the south-west quart and the south-east fractional quarter of section 31, and a of fractional section 32, in township 35 north, range 14 east.

The defendant admitted his possession of section 32 and of parts of the two quarters of section 31, and claimed title thereto, and disclaimed possession or title to the remaining parts.

At the trial, the plaintiff showed title to the south-west quarter of section 31, but did not show any title to the southeast quarter of that section, nor to fractional section 32.

The defendant showed no title to any part of the premises.

Judgment was given for the plaintiff for fractional section 32, and for all that part of the south-east quarter of section 31, as well as of the south-west quarter thereof, which was in the possession of the defendant. This judgment was manifestly erroneous, and must be reversed.

Here, in this court, the defendant offers to remit all right to recover the portions of the land not embraced in his title papers, and asks the court to modify the judgment accordingly. Were this court to undertake to render such judgment, in this case, as the court below should have rendered, it would be necessary also to apportion the damages and monthly value of the premises, which the record does not furnish the means of doing with...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Carter v. Macy
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 6, 1912
    ...648. Plaintiff in ejectment having shown title to a portion of land in dispute cannot recover that to which he has shown no title. Fenwick v. Gill, 34 Mo. 194. In ejectment the plaintiff must show a complete chain of title from the government or the admitted common source of title and the c......
  • Smith v. Wallace
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1938
    ...in his amended petition. In order to recover on this count it was necessary for plaintiff so to do. Finley v. Babb, 144 Mo. 403; Fenwick v. Gill, 34 Mo. 194; Beal Harmon, 38 Mo. 435. (d) The most that can be said of the evidence, under an interpretation most favorable to plaintiff and Harri......
  • Fugate v. Pierce
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 29, 1872
    ...and nothing else. His possession was under a deed to the “mill-site,” and his actual occupation was on the “mill-site” only. (See 34 Mo. 194; De Graw v. Taylor, 37 Mo. 310; Johnson v. Prewitt, 32 Mo. 553, 557; Ang. Lim. 416-21, ch. 31, § 15; id. 423-5, §§ 16, 17; id. 428, § 21; Barr v. Grat......
  • Bernecker v. Miller
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 31, 1869
    ...eighty acres, claiming for Lich's heirs the undivided half, and leaving twenty acres in the west half unaffected by the suit. (24 Mo. 385; 34 Mo. 194; 2 How. 43; R. C. 1855, p. 1111, § 3.) II. The plaintiff could only recover on his own evidence. He rested the case solely on his sheriff's d......
  • Get Started for Free