Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.
| Decision Date | 17 October 1996 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 84156,84167,s. 84156 |
| Citation | 687 So.2d 821 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly S446 FERGUSON TRANSPORTATION, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC., a foreign corporation, Respondent. NORTH AMERICAN VAN LINES, INC., a foreign corporation, Petitioner, v. FERGUSON TRANSPORTATION, INC., etc., Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Jack Scarola of Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, Florida; and Edna L. Caruso of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Coompiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Petitioner/Respondent.
Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Marjorie Gadarian Graham, P.A., Palm Beach, Florida; and Mark E. Haddad and Donald H. Smith of Sidley & Austin, Washington, DC, for Respondent/Petitioner.
We have for review North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Ferguson Transportation, Inc., 639 So.2d 32 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), in which the district court, in a separate order, certified the following question to be of great public importance:
WHETHER UNDER FLORIDA LAW, A PLAINTIFF WHO HAS AN EXCLUSIVE CONTRACT WITHIN A GEOGRAPHICAL TERRITORY, IS AFFORDED A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH ALL PROSPECTIVE CUSTOMERS WITHIN THAT TERRITORY, WHICH IS PROTECTIBLE AGAINST TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE, OR MUST THE PLAINTIFF PROVE A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH IDENTIFIABLE CUSTOMERS?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Consistent with our decision in Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown Manor, Inc., 647 So.2d 812, 815 (Fla.1994), 1 we answer that in order to establish the tort of tortious interference with a business relationship, the plaintiff must prove a business relationship with identifiable customers.
In this case, Ferguson Transportation, Inc. (Ferguson), a Florida moving and storage company, entered an exclusive agency contract with North American Van Lines, Inc. (North American), an interstate carrier of household goods. 2 The contract appointed Ferguson as North American's exclusive agent in Broward County and in Boca Raton. In 1983, Ferguson renewed its Broward County contract for ten years.
In 1986, North American entered an agency contract with Advance Relocation & Storage of Florida, Inc. (Advance Relocation). 3 In the contract, North American appointed Advance Relocation as its nonexclusive agent in West Palm Beach. Ferguson objected to the agreement because it feared that Advance Relocation would intrude into its territory in Broward County. Ferguson's predictions were correct. Advance Relocation's intrusions continued until 1989, when Ferguson finally went out of business.
Ferguson sued North American and Advance Relocation as well as a number of persons in Advanced Relocations's employ, alleging: (1) breach of an exclusive agency agreement; and (2) tortious interference with Ferguson's advantageous business relationships with its Broward County customers. 4 At the close of Ferguson's case, North American moved for a directed verdict. North American alleged that the damages Ferguson sought for the tort and contract claims were identical and, consequently, that Ferguson had not established that its claim for tortious interference amounted to an independent tort. The trial judge denied the motion.
The case went to trial, and the jury returned a verdict in Ferguson's favor on both counts. For each count the jury awarded $1,300,000 in compensatory damages. By stipulation entered prior to trial, the parties agreed to strike one of the awards as duplicative. North American and the other defendants were held jointly and severally liable for the award of compensatory damages, but the jury awarded punitive damages against each defendant individually. The jury assessed North American $13,000,000 in punitive damages.
On appeal, the district court found that the trial judge should have granted North American's motion for directed verdict because Ferguson did not present competent, substantial evidence that appellant interfered with any ongoing business relationship. North American, 639 So.2d at 34. Specifically, the court found that Ferguson's relationship with the public at large was not the type of business relationship required to allege tortious interference with a business relationship. Id. at 33-34. The court determined that the trial judge should have required Ferguson to allege and prove a business relationship with an identifiable person. Id. Because the court found that Ferguson did not prove tortious interference with a business relationship, it reversed the punitive damages award. Id. at 34. We agree with the court's decision.
The district court's decision is consistent with the rule we approved in Ethan Allen, 647 So.2d at 815:
As a general rule, an action for tortious interference with a business relationship requires a business...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Abusaid v. Hillsborough County Bd.
...or agreement between the parties that would likely have been completed absent the defendant's interference. Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., 687 So.2d 821 (Fla.1996) (quoting Ethan Allen, 647 So.2d at 814, 815). Once Plaintiff states a prima facie case with clear allegation......
-
Dube v. Likins
...at 1219-20 (interference with relationship with a company's "enrollees" or "patients" is sufficient); Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., 687 So.2d 821, 821 (Fla.1996) ("business relationship with identifiable customers" required for tort of tortious interference with business......
-
Burge v. Ferguson
...Prods., 262 F.3d at 1154-55 (reviewing the "seemingly divergent body of Florida law"). 18. See also Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., 687 So.2d 821, 821 (Fla.1996) ("[T]o establish the tort of tortious interference with a business relationship, the plaintiff must prove a bus......
-
Thunderwave, Inc. v. Carnival Corp.
...tortious interference, a Plaintiff must "prove a business relationship with an identifiable person." Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. North American Van Lines, Inc., 687 So.2d 821, 822 (Fla.1996). In support of its claim, ThunderWave alleges that Carnival knew and believed that ThunderWave's perfo......
-
Business & commercial cases
...4th DCA 1999). 6. North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Ferguson Transportation, Inc. , 639 So.2d 32, 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), affirmed , 687 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1996). 7. Bernstein v. True , 636 So.2d 1364, 1366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). 8. Zimmerman v. D.C.A. at Welleby, Inc. , 505 So.2d 1371, 1373 (Fl......
-
Post-Tiara: Contracts Are Still King.
...Inn Venture, Ltd. v. Berezovsky, 194 So. 3d 516, 519-20, n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (citing Ferguson Transp., Inc. v. N. Am. Van Lines, Inc., 687 So. 2d 821, 822-23 (Fla. 1996)) ("Florida's independent tort rule precludes the recovery of punitive damages for a breach of contract claim unless th......