Fergusson v. Fergusson
Decision Date | 18 April 1921 |
Docket Number | 283 |
Citation | 229 S.W. 738,148 Ark. 290 |
Parties | FERGUSSON v. FERGUSSON |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor affirmed.
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
Appellants brought this suit in equity against appellee to enjoin him from mortgaging the land described in the complaint.
The complaint alleges that the appellants are the owners of the land described therein which appellee holds in trust for them by virtue of a will executed by their grandfather and duly probated after his death. A portion of the will in question is as follows:
The record shows that appellee and his father each owned an undivided one-half interest in the land described in the complaint; that the father devised his interest to appellee in trust as set out in the will above; that 497 bales of cotton were raised on the place during the year 1920, and that appellee was unable to sell them to any advantage on account of existing conditions; that it was necessary to borrow money with which to run the place during the present year; that he desires to borrow money and run the place in the way in which it has been run during past years and in which other places of similar character in that vicinity are operated; that it is highly essential that the place be cultivated in order to prevent great deterioration of the land and the improvements thereon; that the laborers on the place would leave and it would be very difficult to get them back and to restock the place with farming implements, feed and mules.
The chancellor found that under the terms of the will of J. W. Fergusson, deceased, appellee was authorized to mortgage the land in question. The chancellor further found that it was to the best interest of the trust estate and of appellants that the loan contemplated be made, and that such action was necessary to preserve the property from waste.
It was therefore, decreed that the complaint of appellants be dismissed for want of equity, and that app...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Williams
...where such construction is consistent with rules of law, see 141 Ark. 484; 143 Ark. 519; 146 Ark. 193; 151 Ark. 189; 153 Ark. 421; 148 Ark. 290; Id. 482; 145 Ark. 351; Thompson on Wills, 236; 256 S.W. 355. Since the complaint shows that no persons have been born who can enjoy the property d......
- Southern Trust Company v. American Bank of Commerce & Trust Company
-
Clifford v. McAlester Fuel Company
... ... the honesty and business ability of his executors ... The ... language of the will is even broader than that in ... Fergusson v. Fergusson, 148 Ark. 290, 229 ... S.W. 738, which we construed to authorize the executor to ... mortgage the land of his testator for the purpose ... ...
- Fergusson v. Fergusson