Fernandez-Aguirre v. Gall, FERNANDEZ-AGUIRR

Decision Date25 February 1986
Docket NumberNo. 85-1043,FERNANDEZ-AGUIRR,A,85-1043
Citation11 Fla. L. Weekly 505,484 So.2d 1286
Parties11 Fla. L. Weekly 505 Humbertoppellant, v. Lilly GALL, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

David A. Donet, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Arnaldo Velez, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On April 15, 1982, Lilly Gall sued her former employer, South American Institute, Inc., [Institute] for, inter alia, a breach of employment contract. On June 17, 1982, she filed a notice of lis pendens referring to real property which was owned by the Institute but was subject to a purchase money first mortgage held by Dr. Humberto Fernandez-Aguirre. Fernandez-Aguirre had recorded his mortgage prior to the initiation of Gall's action. After the notice of lis pendens had been filed by Gall, but before judgment on the contract action had been entered, Fernandez-Aguirre successfully prosecuted a foreclosure action against the Institute, bought the property at the foreclosure sale, and received a certificate of title. Gall was not a party to the foreclosure action.

Gall prevailed on the contract action. Her attempt to levy on the property was unsuccessful because the Institute no longer owned the property. Consequently, Gall initiated supplementary proceedings seeking to implead Fernandez-Aguirre as a third-party defendant. Gall alleged that the property was subject to her notice of lis pendens at the time Fernandez-Aguirre filed his foreclosure action. After Fernandez-Aguirre failed to respond to the Rule To Show Cause for Impleading Third Party, the court entered a default against him and impleaded him as a third-party defendant. In his Motion To Set Aside Default, Fernandez-Aguirre informed the court that he intended to re-foreclose on the mortgage "to establish the fact that the interest of [Gall's] is subordinate and inferior to [his] claims...." The court did not set aside the default but instead granted Gall's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and entered a final judgment in favor of Gall. We reverse.

The final judgment entered upon the default cannot stand because it is clear from the record, in particular, from Gall's own Motion for Impleader, that there was no proper basis upon which Gall could be granted relief. As the supreme court stated in North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Moreland, 60 Fla. 153, 157, 53 So. 635, 637 (1910):

A judgment by default properly entered against parties sui juris operates as an admission by the defendants of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Ginsberg v. Lennar Florida Holdings, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Octubre 1994
    ...1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Sunshine Security & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo, 496 So.2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Fernandez-Aguirre v. Gall, 484 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). As this court explained in A default admits liability as claimed in the pleading by the party seeking affirmative rel......
  • Becerra v. Equity Imports, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Febrero 1989
    ...is apparent from the face of the complaint this court is not precluded from ordering relief from the judgment. Fernandez-Aguirre v. Gall, 484 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. Gordy, 129 Fla. 792, 176 So. 860 (1937). See Abrams v. Paul, 453 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DC......
  • Sunshine Sec. & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Octubre 1986
    ...against the said defendant. See North American Accident Insurance Co. v. Moreland, 60 Fla. 153, 53 So. 635 (1910); Fernandez-Aguirre v. Gall, 484 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Bay Products Corp. v. Winters, 341 So.2d 240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); GAC Corp. v. Beach, 308 So.2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA Se......
  • All State Plumbing, Inc. v. Mutual Sec. Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 Noviembre 1988
    ...198 So. 581 (1940). It follows that the subsequently obtained judgment is inferior to the prior recorded mortgage. Fernandez-Aguirre v. Gall, 484 So.2d 1286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Baron v. Aiello, 319 So.2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Silverman v. Rubin, 225 So.2d 429 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); County of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT