Fernandez v. Minsky

Decision Date29 September 1997
Parties, 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 8175 Ramel FERNANDEZ, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Arnold A. MINSKY, et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Rosenberg, Minc & Armstrong, New York (Peter D. Rosenberg, of counsel), for appellants.

Amabile & Erman, P.C., Staten Island (Karen Hauss, of counsel), for respondents Arnold A. Minsky and Ocean Parkway Pediatric Group, Inc.

Before MANGANO, P.J., and COPERTINO, JOY, FLORIO and LUCIANO, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the appeal, as limited by the appellants' brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated October 22, 1996, as (1) denied that branch of a motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the plaintiffs' complaint for failure to serve and file a note of issue, and (2) denied as academic that branch of the motion in which counsel sought to be relieved from representing the plaintiffs.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the branch of the motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the plaintiffs' complaint is granted and the plaintiffs' complaint is reinstated, and the branch of the motion in which counsel sought to be relieved from representing the plaintiffs is granted and counsel are relieved from representing the plaintiffs with respect to the instant action; and it is further,

ORDERED that counsel for the plaintiffs are directed to personally serve the plaintiffs with a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, on or before October 24, 1997, which shall constitute notice to appoint another attorney pursuant to CPLR 321(c); and it is further,

ORDERED that counsel for the plaintiffs are directed to file with the Clerk of this court and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, proof of service upon the plaintiffs of the instant decision and order; and it is further,

ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the plaintiffs, without leave of the Supreme Court, Kings County, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon them personally of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

In the instant case the Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint, apparently pursuant to CPLR 3216(a), based upon the plaintiffs' failure to serve and file a note of issue as directed by the court. Thereafter, the Supreme Court denied that branch of the motion which was to vacate the dismissal of the plaintiffs' complaint and that branch of the motion in which counsel sought to be relieved from representing the plaintiffs. We revers...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Krause v. Lobacz
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Septiembre 2015
    ...67 A.D.3d 750, 751, 888 N.Y.S.2d 599 ; Kesar v. Green Ridge Enters. Corp., 30 A.D.3d 471, 471, 817 N.Y.S.2d 343 ; Fernandez v. Minsky, 242 A.D.2d 665, 666, 662 N.Y.S.2d 574...
  • Jacobs v. Cirnigliaro
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Marzo 1999
    ...14, 1998, dismissing the complaint (see, Chase v. Scavuzzo, 87 N.Y.2d 228, 233, 638 N.Y.S.2d 587, 661 N.E.2d 1368; Fernandez v. Minsky, 242 A.D.2d 665, 662 N.Y.S.2d 574; cf., Longacre Corp. v. Better Hosp. Equip. Corp., 228 A.D.2d 653, 646 N.Y.S.2d However, contrary to the plaintiff's claim......
  • Schwartz v. Nathanson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Mayo 1999
    ...a failure of a condition precedent, and the court was not authorized to dismiss the action on its own motion (see, Fernandez v. Minsky, 242 A.D.2d 665, 666, 662 N.Y.S.2d 574; Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangeley Lakes Corp., 222 A.D.2d 631, 632, 635 N.Y.S.2d 691; cf., Athanasiou v. Esposito, 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT