Ferraro v. Rettaliata

Decision Date24 September 1990
PartiesStephen C. FERRARO, et al., Respondents, v. Antonia RETTALIATA, et al., Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Schapiro & Reich, Lindenhurst (Steven M. Schapiro and Perry S. Reich, of counsel), for appellants.

Gary P. Field, Huntington, for respondents.

Before THOMPSON, J.P., and LAWRENCE, MILLER and O'BRIEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 of the Town of Huntington, invalid, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.), entered July 2, 1990, which (1) denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment, (2) granted the plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment, (3) declared Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 of the Town of Huntington null and void, and (4) permanently enjoined the implementation of the voided local laws.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' cross motion is denied, the defendants' motion is granted, and it is declared that Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 of the Town of Huntington are valid and effective.

The defendants, collectively constituting the Town Board of the Town of Huntington (hereafter referred to as the Town Board), are appealing from a judgment which, inter alia, declared Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 of the Town of Huntington "null and void," apparently on the ground that these laws should have been submitted to a referendum, because, according to the Supreme Court and the plaintiff, they abrogated powers conferred upon the Town Supervisor (see, Municipal Home Rule Law § 23[2][f]. The plaintiffs are both taxpayers in the Town of Huntington, and, at the time the action was commenced, Ferraro was the Supervisor-elect of the Town of Huntington, which is classified a suburban town (see, Town Law article 3-A).

Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 each purport to restore to the Town Board the power to appoint the administrative heads of certain departments, which power was originally vested in the Town Board, but, by Local Laws, 1986, No. 2, and Local Laws, 1988, No. 6 of the Town of Huntington, was transferred to the Town Supervisor. The plaintiffs argue that Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 of the Town of Huntington are invalid because they purport to abolish powers of the Town Supervisor yet were never submitted to the voters for their approval, in contravention of the mandate of Municipal Home Rule Law § 23(2)(f).

Municipal Home Rule Law § 23(2)(f) provides as follows:

"2. Except as otherwise provided by or under authority of a state statute, a local law shall be subject to mandatory referendum if it:

* * * * * *

"f. Abolishes, transfers or curtails any power of an elective officer".

While Local Laws, 1989, Nos. 9 and 10 attempt to transfer powers of the Town Supervisor, an elective officer (see, Town Law § 20[1][a], by statute, a town board has the power to appoint heads and deputies of departments of town government (see, Town Law §§ 51[1], 53-a, 53-b). Since the disputed power of appointment originally resided with the Town Board of the Town of Huntington, a body of elective officers (see, Town Law §§ 20[1][a], the referendum provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law are equally applicable to any curtailment of the Town Board's powers (see, Matter of Doherty v. Sanvidge, 58 Misc.2d 347, 352, 353, 295 N.Y.S.2d 368; see also, Matter of Fogarty v. Warden, 191 Misc. 916, 919-920, 79 N.Y.S.2d 364, affd. 273 App.Div. 910, 78...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Dagnoli v. Spring Valley Mobile Village
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 24, 1990
  • New York Public Interest Research Group v. Giuliani
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 13, 1996
    ...such must be approved by referendum (see, Morin v. Foster, 45 N.Y.2d 287, 295, 408 N.Y.S.2d 387, 380 N.E.2d 217; Ferraro v. Rettaliata, 165 A.D.2d 860, 861-862, 560 N.Y.S.2d 325, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 713, 563 N.Y.S.2d 769, 565 N.E.2d 518). The New York City Charter, adopted in 1989 by a ref......
  • Mantello v. City of Troy
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1997
    ...removed pursuant to Local Law No. 9 (1995). The Court finds Local Law No. 9 (1995) to be void ab initio (see, Ferraro v. Rettaliata, 165 A.D.2d 860, 560 N.Y.S.2d 325 [Second Dept., 1990], supra ) and in any event, it could not amend a City Charter not yet in (6) Petitioner maintains that un......
  • Ferraro v. Rettaliata
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 29, 1990
    ...76 N.Y.2d 713, 565 N.E.2d 518 Ferraro (Stephen C.) v. Rettaliata (Antonia) NO. 1164 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK NOV 29, 1990 165 A.D.2d 860, 560 N.Y.S.2d 325 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO GRANTED OR DENIED. Denied. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT