Ferreira v. Wyckoff Heights Med. Ctr.
Decision Date | 01 February 2011 |
Citation | 915 N.Y.S.2d 631,81 A.D.3d 587 |
Parties | Lucia FERREIRA, etc., plaintiff-respondent, et al., plaintiff, v. WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant, et al., defendants; Irving Spodek, etc., third-party defendant-respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
81 A.D.3d 587
Lucia FERREIRA, etc., plaintiff-respondent, et al., plaintiff,
v.
WYCKOFF HEIGHTS MEDICAL CENTER, defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant, et al., defendants;
Irving Spodek, etc., third-party defendant-respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb. 1, 2011.
Arshack & Hajek, PLLC (Mauro Goldberg & Lilling, LLP, Great Neck, N.Y. [Caryn L. Lilling and Katherine Herr Solomon], of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Theodore Pavlounis (Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York, N.Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.
Garbarini & Scher, P.C., New York, N.Y. (William D. Buckley of counsel), for third-party defendant-respondent.
JOSEPH COVELLO, J.P., RANDALL T. ENG, CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, and L. PRISCILLA HALL, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals, by permission, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Appellate Term for the 2nd, 11th, and 13th Judicial Districts dated May 22, 2009, as (1) affirmed so much of a judgment of the Civil Court, Kings County (Sweeney, J.), entered March 28, 2007, as,
ORDERED that the order dated May 22, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The defendant third-party plaintiff, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center (hereinafter WHMC), contends that the jury's finding that the plaintiff, Lucia Ferreira, was negligent was inconsistent
To continue reading
Request your trial-
HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n v. McKenna
...assumed position, the party secured a judgment or some other favorable judicial action. ( See Ferreira v. Wyckoff Hgts. Med. Ctr., 81 A.D.3d 587, 588, 915 N.Y.S.2d 631 [2d Dept.2011];Angel v. Bank of Tokyo–Mitsubishi, Ltd., 39 A.D.3d 368, 371, 835 N.Y.S.2d 57 [1st Dept.2007];Bono v. Cucinel......
-
W.O.R.C. Realty Corp. v. Bd. of Assessors
...expert testimony is entitled to great weight ( see Saccone v. Gross, 84 A.D.3d 1208, 1209, 923 N.Y.S.2d 878;Ferreira v. Wyckoff Hgts. Med. Ctr., 81 A.D.3d 587, 588, 915 N.Y.S.2d 631;Segal v. City of New York, 66 A.D.3d 865, 867, 887 N.Y.S.2d 624). We agree with the trial court's acceptance ......
-
Cardona v. 1717 44th St.
...estopped from asserting the inconsistent argument made in support of its cross motion (see Ferreira v Wyckoff Heights Med. Ctr, 81 A.D.3d 587, 588 [2d Dept 2011]; see also WestVue NPL Trust II v (Jokey, 175 A.D.3d 1463, 1465 [2d Dept 2019]; cf. Lorenzo v Kahn, 100 A.D.3d 1480, 1482-1483 [4t......
-
Cardona v. 1717 44th St.
...estopped from asserting the inconsistent argument made in support of its cross motion (see Ferreira v Wyckoff Heights Med. Ctr, 81 A.D.3d 587, 588 [2d Dept 2011]; see also WestVue NPL Trust II v (Jokey, 175 A.D.3d 1463, 1465 [2d Dept 2019]; cf. Lorenzo v Kahn, 100 A.D.3d 1480, 1482-1483 [4t......