Fiat Motors of North America, Inc. v. Calvin

Decision Date28 March 1978
Docket NumberNo. FF-223,FF-223
Citation356 So.2d 908
PartiesFIAT MOTORS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Petitioner, v. John D. CALVIN as Director, Division of Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida, and the Division of Motor Vehicles of the State of Florida, and Alpine Motors, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Respondents.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Franklyn A. Johnson, Jr. of Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwody & Cole, Miami, and Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst, New York City, for petitioner.

Edwin E. Strickland, Gen. Counsel, and Enoch J. Whitney, Asst. Gen. Counsel, for Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for respondents.

SMITH, Judge.

By petition for writ of prohibition, which we treat as a petition for review of preliminary agency action, Section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes (1977), Fiat Motors of North America, Inc., seeks review of an order of the Division of Motor Vehicles of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles in which the Division assumed jurisdiction to determine if Fiat unfairly canceled the dealership franchise of Alpine Motors, Inc. Section 320.641(3), Florida Statutes (1977), provides (3) Any motor vehicle dealer whose franchise agreement is discontinued, canceled, or not renewed may, within (90 days before the date of cancellation), file with the (Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles) a verified complaint in triplicate for a determination of unfair discontinuation or cancellation. Agreements and certificates of appointment shall continue in effect until final determination by the department of the issues raised in such complaint by the motor vehicle dealer, and no replacement motor vehicle dealer shall be named for this point or location to engage in business prior to the final adjudication by the department on the discontinuation, cancellation, or failure to renew.

When Fiat notified Alpine, a Fort Lauderdale dealer, that its dealership would be discontinued in 90 days, Alpine sent an unsworn letter to the Division asserting that the planned termination was "highly unfair" for stated reasons. Accepting Alpine's letter in lieu of the verified complaint required by the statute, respondent Calvin, director of the Division, entered an order setting a hearing under Section 320.641(3).

Alpine's failure to timely file the required verified complaint left the Division without jurisdiction and, upon expiration of the 90-day period for initiating proceedings, without power to acquire...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Andrews v. Florida Parole Com'n
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 18, 2000
    ...State ex rel. Greenb[e]rg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628, 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)." Fiat Motors of N. Am. v. Calvin, 356 So.2d 908, 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). See Art. I, § 18, Fla. Const. ("No administrative agency shall impose a sentence of imprisonment, nor shall it imp......
  • Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. State Dept. of Business Regulation, Div. of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, PARI-MUTUEL
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 17, 1983
    ...of Florida, 281 So.2d 493 (Fla.1973); State v. Office of the Comptroller, 416 So.2d 820 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Fiat Motors of North America, Inc. v. Calvin, 356 So.2d 908 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1978); State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 S......
  • Mathis v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 15, 1999
    ...State ex rel. Greenb[e]rg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628, 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)." Fiat Motors of N. Am. v. Calvin, 356 So.2d 908, 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). They do not have inherent power to sanction parties by dismissing their claims. See State, Dep't of Envtl. Regulat......
  • STATE, BD. OF TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND v. Day …
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 13, 2001
    ...State ex rel. Greenb[e]rg v. Florida State Bd. of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628, 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)." Fiat Motors of N. Am. v. Calvin, 356 So.2d 908, 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The statutory provisions governing rulemaking must be interpreted in light of the Legislature's stated intent to cla......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT