Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Getzendanner
Decision Date | 04 November 1899 |
Citation | 53 S.W. 838 |
Parties | FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK v. GETZENDANNER et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Tarrant county; Irley Dunklin, Judge.
Action by John A. Getzendanner and others against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Harris, Etheridge & Knight, for appellant. Flournoy & Altman, for appellees.
The accident policy declared on insured John A. Getzendanner in the sum of $25 per week against bodily injuries sustained through external, violent, and accidental means, as follows, quoting its second clause: "Or if such injuries, independently of all other causes, shall immediately, continuously, and wholly disable and prevent the assured from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, the company will pay the assured the weekly indemnity before specified, during the continuance of such disability, but not exceeding fifty-two consecutive weeks." The occupation of the assured was that of "visiting yards and ranches, buying and selling cattle not in transit." During the life of the policy, about January 10, 1897, while engaged in driving a cow on horseback, the assured, his horse stumbling, fell to the ground, and, though there were then no signs of physical injury, on the 1st day of March following became wholly insane, and has ever since been confined in the lunatic asylum. According to the agreed statement of facts, whether this insanity was caused by the fall from the horse, or whether the assured, "for a month or six weeks after the accident, was up and about, and attending to his business," were controverted issues, upon which the testimony would have sustained a verdict either way. The fourth paragraph of the agreed statement of facts reads: "The testimony was conflicting as to whether the injuries of the assured resulting from the accident did or did not, independently of all other causes, immediately, continuously, and wholly disable and prevent him from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation; but there was sufficient evidence to support a verdict for either party upon this issue." There was no other controverted issue of fact.
The main contention of appellant is that the court erred in submitting the issue of total disability to the jury; the charge reading: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. Reddin
...unable, in the exercise of ordinary care, to perform every material duty pertaining to his occupation. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Getzendanner, 93 Tex. 487, 53 S. W. 838, 55 S. W. 179, 56 S. W. 326; Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Joiner (Tex. Civ. App.) 178 S. W. 806, 808 (W. of E. ref.); North......
-
North American Accident Ins. Co. v. Miller
...that case is well fortified by the authorities therein cited. Commonwealth Bonding, etc., v. Bryant, 185 S. W. 979; Fidelity, etc., v. Getzendanner, 93 Tex. 487, 53 S. W. 838, 55 S. W. 179, 56 S. W. 326; 14 R. C. L. § 491, Insurance. The appellant cites and relies upon the case of Continent......
-
Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. Curfman, 12750.
...experience, he, since the injury, in the exercise of prudence could have done, and be able to do in the future. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Getzendanner, 93 Tex. 487, 53 S.W. 838, 55 S.W. 179, 56 S.W. 326; Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Joiner, Tex.Civ.App., 178 S. W. 806, 808, writ of error ref......
-
New York Life, Ins. Co. v. Bain
... ... Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 111 So. 453, 146 [169 Miss ... 272] Miss. 18; Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v ... Cato, 74 So. 114, 113 Miss. 286 ... The ... record in this case shows ... 558; ... Shirts v. Phoenix Acc. & Sick Benefit Asso., 135 ... Mich. 439, 97 N.W. 966; Fidelity & Casualty Co. v ... Getzendanner, 93 Tex. 487, 53 S.W. 838, 55 S.W. 179; ... Hurley v. Bankers' ... ...