Fifth Third Bank v. Estate of Shaw-Schneller
Decision Date | 05 November 2019 |
Docket Number | No. SD 35767,SD 35767 |
Citation | 586 S.W.3d 887 (Mem) |
Parties | FIFTH THIRD BANK, Respondent, v. ESTATE OF Patricia Lynn SHAW-SCHNELLER, a/k/a Patricia Schneller, Deceased, Carney Schneller, a/k/a Carney J. Schneller, Deceased, Defendants, Janet Lea Schneller, a/k/a Janet Lea Collier, Appellant, and Ncmic Finance Corporation, Defendant. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appellant is acting pro se.
Respondent’s attorney: Scott D. Mosier, St Louis.
Before Scott, P.J., Bates, C.J., and Sheffield, J.
Appellant appeals pro se from a land-title judgment. Her brief’s severe Rule 84.04 violations compel us to dismiss.
We will not detail all deficiencies, but focus only on the brief’s "Points Relied On" and "Argument" sections quoted below, without correction, in their entirety:
The following fairly describes Appellant’s flawed points:
Washington v. Blackburn , 286 S.W.3d 818, 821 (Mo. App. 2009) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
As for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Butler Cnty. Juvenile Office v. J.E.B. (In re Interest of J.X.B.)
...2014, unless otherwise indicated.8 All rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2017).9 Fifth Third Bank v. Estate of Shaw-Schneller , 586 S.W.3d 887, 888 (Mo. App. S.D. 2019).10 Such failure "task[s] this court with assuming the role of advocate[,]" which we will not do. Marck Indus., ......
-
Blanchard v. Blanchard (In re Blanchard)
...choice but to affirm[,] ... and that there is no point in pursuing the appeal further.Id. at 762.7 Fifth Third Bank v. Estate of Shaw-Schneller , 586 S.W.3d 887, 888 (Mo. App. S.D. 2019).8 Abuse of discretion, erroneous application of the law, not supported by substantial evidence, and agai......
-
Biggs v. Brinneman
...as "[a] point relied on that fails to comply with Rule 84.04(d) preserves nothing for appeal." Fifth Third Bank v. Estate of Shaw-Schneller , 586 S.W.3d 887, 888 (Mo. App. S.D. 2019).Standard of ReviewBrinneman’s standard of review section correctly recites that our standard of review is co......
- Juvenile Officer v. G.D. (In re Interest of G.D.), WD 82626