Filley v. McHenry

Decision Date31 October 1884
PartiesFILLEY et al., Administrators, Appellants, v. MCHENRY.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

Wm. C. Jones and John D. Johnson for appellants.

J. S. Fullerton and Hugo Muench for respondent.

EWING, C.

Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant and Peter L. Foy were, on April 4, 1868, co-partners, and as such purchased the Evening Dispatch newspaper, and in part consideration for the payment thereof, assumed to pay to plaintiffs' intestate certain moneys alleged to have been owing by said Evening Dispatch to said Oliver D. Filley, deceased, and this suit was commenced to recover the money due to Filley. The defendant's answer put in issue all the allegations in plaintiffs' petition, and especially the averment that defendant and Foy were copartners, and had assumed the payment of the debt sued for. Upon a trial of the case there was a verdict and judgment for the defendant,. from which plaintiffs appealed to the St. Louis court of appeals, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed, and from whose judgment plaintiffs appeal to this court.

After a thorough examination of the record, and the opinion of the court of appeals, we can find no substantial error in the trial court, for which this case ought to be reversed. On the contrary we believe the well considered opinion of the court of appeals correctly lays down the law of the case, which we adopt as our report without re-writing at length the reasons therefor. The judgment of the court of appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Hemelreich v. Carlos
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1887
    ...the evidence. This court will not weigh evidence. Greffett v. Dowdall, 17 Mo. App. 280; McGinness v. Mitchell, 21 Mo. App. 493; Filley v. McHenry, 84 Mo. 277; Miller v. Breneke, 83 Mo. 163. III. The act of 1883 (Laws Mo. p. 113) expressly authorizes a judgment for costs against a married wo......
  • Hemelreich v. Carlos
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1887
    ... ... This court will not weigh ... evidence. Greffett v. Dowdall, 17 Mo.App. 280; ... McGinness v. Mitchell, 21 Mo.App. 493; Filley v ... McHenry, 84 Mo. 277; Miller v. Breneke, 83 Mo ...          III ... The act of 1883 (Laws Mo. p. 113) expressly authorizes a ... ...
  • Andrews v. Costican
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 13, 1888
    ... ... immaterial whether the instructions given are correct ... Williamson v. Drew, 9 Mo.App. 597; Liebke v ... Methudy, 18 Mo.App. 149; Filley v. McHenry, 84 ... Mo. 277. A new trial will not be awarded where it is evident ... from all the testimony in the case that the verdict is for ... ...
  • Chouteau v. Jupiter Iron-Works
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1888
    ... ... Branger v ... Chevalier, 9 Cal. 353; R. S., sec. 3775; Huskins v ... Railroad, 58 Mo. 302; Filley v. McHenry, 84 Mo ... 277; Wright v. McPike, 70 Mo. 180; State v ... Fritterer, 65 Mo. 422; State v. Christian, 66 ... Mo. 138; State v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT