Fink v. San Augustine Grocery Co.
Decision Date | 15 April 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 6527.) |
Citation | 167 S.W. 35 |
Parties | FINK v. SAN AUGUSTINE GROCERY CO. et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
H. B. Short, of Center, and Foster & Davis, of San Augustine, for plaintiff in error. Davis & Ramsey, of San Augustine, for defendant in error.
At a former day of this term we affirmed the judgment of the trial court in this case, without a written opinion. Plaintiff in error in due time filed motions for rehearing and for a written opinion. We have overruled both motions; but in view of the earnest insistence of counsel, in an able argument filed in support of said motions, we deem it proper to state the grounds of our conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed, and that the case was not one which required a written opinion by this court.
The suit was brought by the appellee, San Augustine Grocery Company, as assignee of the San Augustine Lumber Company, against appellant and the San Augustine Lumber Company, to recover the sum of $565.75 balance due of the purchase price of 157,275 feet of pine lumber sold and delivered by said lumber company to appellant.
Plaintiff's petition contains the following allegations: "Plaintiff further represents to the court that heretofore, to wit, on or about April 22, 1908, the defendant San Augustine Lumber Company and W. A. Fink entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the defendant San Augustine Lumber Company, through its duly authorized officer, F. P. Adams, and its agent, agreed, bound, and obligated itself to sell and deliver to the defendant W. A. Fink f. o. b. cars at the mill of defendant San Augustine Lumber Company, in the county of San Augustine and state of Texas, certain pine lumber at certain stipulated prices, as follows:" Here follows an itemized statement of the lumber included in said contract, and the prices agreed to be paid therefor by appellant. This statement shows that the lumber included in the contract aggregated 236,085 feet.
The petition continues: "The said defendant San Augustine Lumber Company further agreeing by terms of said contract to ship one car of lumber so sold, 1×4 and 1×8, at once, and balance as fast as can get out, and further agreeing to ship entire bill of lumber so sold and agreed to be shipped within four months, and in said contract acknowledging receipt, paid to it by said W. A. Fink, of the sum of $25; and the said defendant W. A. Fink agreed, bound, and obligated himself to pay to the defendant San Augustine Lumber Company, for said lumber so bought to be delivered, and which was delivered, the price per thousand feet as stipulated and set out in said contract, as above set out, to the San Augustine Lumber Company, and did pay, at the time of entering into said contract, the said sum of $25 cash, and further agreeing by the terms of said contract to pay to the said defendant San Augustine Lumber Company 80 per cent. on receipt of bill of lading, and the balance of 20 per cent. when the last two cars were shipped. Plaintiff further represents to the court that the defendant San Augustine Lumber Company, complying with the terms of said contract, did ship and deliver to the defendant W. A. Fink 11 cars of pine lumber on the dates as follows:" Then follows a statement of the various shipments made by the lumber company to appellant and the amount due upon each shipment. This statement shows that on various and sundry dates, beginning on April 29, 1908, and ending on August 19, 1908, the lumber company made shipments of lumber to appellant according to the terms of its contract, aggregating 157,275 feet, of the agreed value of $1,704.46.
It is then alleged that appellant had made payments to the lumber company under his contract as follows: It is then alleged that the lumber company had sold and transferred its said account for $565.75 against appellant to appellee, San Augustine Grocery Company, and had guaranteed in writing the payment of same.
The petition continues as follows:
The appellant answered by general demurrer and several special exceptions, one of which is as follows: "This defendant further specially excepts to plaintiff's petition for the reason that the same is ambiguous and inconsistent in that the plaintiff first declares and predicates its cause of action upon an alleged written contract between the San Augustine Lumber Company and this defendant, and then declares upon another and different contract involving the same lumber, and which is shown by the petition to be the same transaction as first set out, and also undertakes to declare upon a cause of action for lumber delivered by the San Augustine Lumber Company to this defendant at his special instance and request, the petition showing that the same transaction is involved, wherefore he prays a judgment of the court." He further answered by general denial and by special plea in which it is averred in substance that the lumber company failed and refused to ship him the whole quantity of lumber specified in said contract, and by reason thereof he was damaged in a sum larger than the amount of balance due said company on the lumber shipped him.
In reply to defendant's answer, plaintiff filed a supplemental...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arcola Sugar Mills Co. v. Houston Lighting & P. Co.
...v. Gatling, Tex. Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Tucker & Co. v. Freiberg & Kahn, 46 Tex.Civ.App. 160, 101 S.W. 837, 838; Fink v. San Augustine Grocery Co., Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W. 35, error dismissed; Delaune v. Beaumont Irr. Co., 38 Tex.Civ.App. 225, 85 S.W. 438, error dismissed; Wright v. Hooker......
-
Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.
...and proof of appellee's willingness and ability to perform was essential only to fixing the amount of its recovery. Fink v. St. Augustine Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 167 S. W. 35; El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Eichel & Weikel (Tex. Civ. App.) 130 S. W. 940; National Equitable Society v. Tennison (Tex.......
-
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Larkin
...Thompson v. Caldwell et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 22 S.W.(2d) 720; May v. Anthony (Tex. Civ. App.) 151 S. W. 602; Fink v. San Augustine Grocery Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 167 S. W. 35; Townes Texas Pleading (2d Ed.) pp. 444, 447, and There is in our jurisprudence a pleading known as "a trial amendment......
-
First Nat. Bank of Knox City v. Boyd, 1310.
...Schaff v. Perdue (Tex. Civ. App.) 254 S. W. 151; Oak Cliff Ice, etc., v. Peterson (Tex. Civ. App.) 300 S. W. 107; Fink v. San Augustine Groc. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 167 S. W. 35; Burger v. Ray (Tex. Civ. App.) 239 S. W. 257; Blewitt v. Greene (Tex. Civ. App.) 122 S. W. 914; Burks v. Burks (Te......