Finley v. Babb

Decision Date31 May 1898
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesFINLEY v. BABB et al.

Appeal from circuit court, Scott county; H. C. Riley, Judge.

Ejectment by Henry L. Finley against William Babb and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Russell & Deal, for appellant. Joe W. Moore, for respondents.

BURGESS, J.

This is an action of ejectment for the possession of the N. W. ¼ of the S. W. ¼ of section 33, township 27, range 15, in Scott county, Mo. The trial was before the court, a jury being waived. There was judgment in favor of defendants, from which plaintiff appealed.

The case was tried upon the following agreed statement of facts: "Mrs. Missouri Kirkpatrick was the owner of the land in dispute. On the 20th day of September, 1892, her son, Lank Kirkpatrick, made a trust deed on the land to Wm. Halloway, trustee for J. R. Hagan, to secure a note of $300. This deed of trust was signed by Lank Kirkpatrick for himself; and he signed his mother's name, without her knowledge or consent, to the deed, and forged the justice's certificate of acknowledgment to the same, without the knowledge or consent of the justice or of his mother. This deed of trust was recorded September 27, 1892. The mother, while she did not authorize the signing of the deed, says that he did all of her business, and frequently signed her name, and, had he asked her permission, she would have authorized him to sign her name, and as soon as she learned he had done so she was willing to ratify the act, and is now, and will acquiesce in the fact, so far as she and her interest goes; and this fact was known by all the parties to this suit before they purchased the land. On the 20th day of October, 1892, Missouri Kirkpatrick made a genuine deed of trust on the same land to Wm. Hunter, trustee for H. L. Finley, to secure $695, recorded December 22, 1892. On December 8, 1894, trustee sold under the last deed of trust. The trustee at the sale...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Stonum v. Davis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1941
    ...for the land by the United States to the state and from the state to the county. Redfield v. Park, 132 U.S. 239, 33 L. Ed. 327; Finley v. Babb, 144 Mo. 403; Finley v. Babb, 173 Mo. 261; Beal v. Harmon, 38 Mo. 436; Gibson v. Chouteau, 39 Mo. 537; Gibson v. Chouteau, 13 Wall. 92, 20 L. Ed. 53......
  • Stonum v. Davis
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1941
    ...for the land by the United States to the state and from the state to the county. Redfield v. Park, 132 U.S. 239, 33 L.Ed. 327; Finley v. Babb, 144 Mo. 403; Finley v. Babb, 173 Mo. 261; Beal v. Harmon, 38 Mo. 436; Gibson v. Chouteau, 39 Mo. 537; Gibson v. Chouteau, 13 Wall. 92, 20 L.Ed. 535;......
  • Smith v. Wallace
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 17, 1938
    ... ... petition. In order to recover on this count it was necessary ... for plaintiff so to do. Finley v. Babb, 144 Mo. 403; ... Fenwick v. Gill, 34 Mo. 194; Beal v ... Harmon, 38 Mo. 435. (d) The most that can be said of the ... evidence, ... ...
  • Bailey v. Williams
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1959
    ...was first instituted. Respondents also cite Weinwick v. Bender, 33 Mo. 80; Heard v. Ritchey, 112 Mo. 516, 20 S.W. 799; Finley v. Babb, 144 Mo. 403, 46 S.W. 165; and Payne v. School District, 87 Mo.App. 415, The rule upon which the trial court and counsel for respondents rely was based upon ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT