Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. Masterson
Citation | 83 S.W. 49 |
Parties | FIRE ASS'N OF PHILADELPHIA v. MASTERSON et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Decision Date | 22 October 1904 |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Hill County Court; L. C. Hill, Judge.
Action by W. R. Masterson and others against the Fire Association of Philadelphia. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Alexander & Thompson, A. G. Walker, and S. J. Hogsett, for appellant. Wear, Morrow & Smithdeal, for appellees.
Suit by appellees in the county court of Hill county, Tex., to recover on two insurance policies—one for $500, executed December 16, 1899, and one for $400, executed January 9, 1900. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appealed.
Conclusions of Fact.
In December, 1899, W. R. Masterson was the owner of a stock of groceries in the town of Whitney, Hill county, Tex., in the possession of L. E. Miller. It had been agreed that Masterson would furnish the merchandise and that Miller should conduct a grocery business in said town, and that the profits should be divided between them. On the 16th of December, 1899, the Fire Association of Philadelphia, through its agent, A. G. McMahan, executed to L. E. Miller a policy of insurance for five hundred dollars The policy contained what is known as the "iron-safe clause," wherein the assured covenanted as follows: At the time the policy was issued the merchandise was being received by Miller in his store at Whitney from Masterson, who resided at and did business at Hillsboro. No inventory had been taken of the goods, but Miller was furnished with invoices, showing in detail the kind and amount of goods and value. These invoices were furnished by Masterson as the goods were delivered. On January 1, 1900, McMahan was informed by Miller that no inventory had been taken of the goods, and he consented and agreed, in effect, that the invoices so furnished by Masterson would be accepted as a compliance of the clause of the policy requiring an inventory to be taken within 30 days if none had been taken within the preceding 12 months. McMahan thereby waived the clause of the policy requiring the taking of an inventory. On January 9, 1900, a similar policy was executed by McMahan, as agent for said association, to Miller, on the same stock of merchandise. The premium called for $9 in the first policy and $7.30 in the second policy, was paid to McMahan, and by him forwarded to the company, and has not been returned to the assured. The assured kept a set of books which clearly showed a complete record of his business, including all purchases for cash and on credit, from date of policies and invoices to time of fire, which occurred on the 4th day of June, 1900, without fault on the part of the assured, and which entirely destroyed the property insured. The cashbook and ledger kept by the assured for the months of December, January, and part of February were destroyed by the fire that destroyed the stock. The footings, however, from his cashbook and ledger so destroyed in February were transferred to a new cashbook and ledger, respectively, and were shown therein. At the time of the trial the following books were introduced in evidence: Cashbook, beginning on December 15th, and running to the time of the fire, in which were kept sales of merchandise for cash, purchases for cash, and collections. Ledger from February 1st to the time of the fire, showing merchandise account and individual accounts on credit, and also showing balances brought forward from Ledger A. Index to ledger, kept from February 1st to the time of the fire. Counter blotter, or charge book, showing credit sales from March 1st to the time of the fire. Counter blotter, or charge book, showing credit sales from ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cohen v. Home Ins., Co.
... ... corporation of New York, for recovery on two fire insurance ... policies. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error ... 1904, the same court, in the case of Fire Ass'n of ... Philadelphia v. Masterson (Tex. Civ. App.) 83 ... S.W. 49, being an iron safe ... ...
-
Cohen v. Home Ins. Co.
...of the state of Texas in 1896, but in 1904, the same court, in the case of Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. Masterson (Tex. Civ. App.) 83 S. W. 49, being an iron safe clause case, held that the agent had the power and authority to waive the iron safe clause after the issuance and delivery of t......
-
People's Fire Insurance Association of Arkansas v. Goyne
... ... Company v. Grand View Bldg. Assn., 183 ... U.S. 308, 46 L.Ed. 213, 22 S.Ct. 133, has decided these ... questions otherwise. Mr ... Vesey v. Com. Union Assn. Co., 18 S.D. 632, ... 101 N.W. 1074; Fire Assn. v. Masterson, 83 ... S.W. 49; Nute v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., ... 109 Mo.App. 585, 83 S.W. 83; ... ...
-
Fletcher v. Eagle
...to the circuit court. 31 Ark. 352; 8 Ark. 60; 1 Story, Eq. Jur. 457; Adams, Eq. 431; 2 Morawetz, Corp. §§ 796, 864; Cook, Corp. 892; 83 S.W. 49. It was error to exclude depositions of Eagle and Hicks. 1 Phillips, Ev. 395; 3 Greenleaf, Ev. 337; 1 Id. 552; 42 Ark. 288; 45 Mo. 267; 69 Mo. 365;......