First Div. St. P. & P. R. R. Co. v. City of St. Paul
Decision Date | 14 May 1875 |
Citation | 21 Minn. 526 |
Parties | FIRST DIVISION OF THE ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY <I>vs.</I> CITY OF ST. PAUL. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
Rosabel street in that city, and the usual proceedings were instituted by the city, in the court of common pleas for Ramsey county, to obtain a judgment against the land for the amount of the assessment. The First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. appeared in court, claiming that it was the owner of the land, that it occupied and used the same for the purposes of its railroad, that the land formed no part of the company's land grant, that the company had paid into the state treasury all sums required by law in lieu of taxes and assessments, and that the land was therefore exempt from all taxes and assessments whatsoever, including the assessment then sought to be enforced against it. At the trial, before Hall, J., the company proved its corporate existence, its ownership and operation of the railroad authorized by its charter and all the other facts alleged by it as the grounds of its objection to the assessment. The court, however, decided that the land was not exempt, and ordered judgment against the land for the amount of the assessment, to which ruling the company duly excepted. A bill of exceptions was allowed, and judgment having been entered in accordance with the order of the court, the company removed the case to this court by certiorari.
Bigelow, Flandrau & Clark, for plaintiff in error.
W. A. Gorman and H. J. Horn, for defendant in error.
The charter under which this company holds its franchises and property, by § 18, provides: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Northern Pacific Railway Company, a Corp. v. Richland County, a Municipal Corporation
...& A. R. Co. 170 Mass. 95, 49 N.E. 95; Auditor General v. Duluth, S. S. & A. R. Co. 116 Mich. 122, 74 N.W. 505; First Div. St. Paul & P. R. Co. v. St. Paul, 21 Minn. 526; St. Paul St. Paul & S. C. R. Co. 23 Minn. 469; State ex rel. Minnesota Transfer R. Co. v. District Ct. 68 Minn. 242, 71 N......
-
Paving District of fort Smith v. Sisters of Mercy
...is clearly recognized in the case of Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co., 28 Cal. 345, and also in the case First Division of the St. P. & Pac. Rd. Co. v. St. Paul, 21 Minn. 526. In State of Rhode Island it has been held that, though technically speaking a street assessment is a tax, the word "t......
-
State ex rel. Village of Clara City v. Great Northern Railway Company
... ... local, special or extraordinary assessments or charges ... First Division St. P. & Pac. R. Co. v. City of St ... Paul, 21 Minn. 526; City of St. Paul v. St. Paul ... ...
-
State ex rel. Vill. of Clara City v. Great N. Ry. Co.
...from all general or ordinary taxes, but from all local, special, or extraordinary assessments or charges. First Division St. P. & Pac. R. Co. v. City of St. Paul, 21 Minn. 526;City of St. Paul v. St. P. & S. C. R. Co., 23 Minn. 469;Patterson v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co., 99 Minn. 454, 109 N. W.......