First Nat. Bank of Englewood v. District Court In and For Jefferson County
Citation | 164 Colo. 9,432 P.2d 1 |
Decision Date | 02 October 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 22814,22814 |
Parties | The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ENGLEWOOD as Guardian of the Estate of Robert H. Kornock, a minor, and as Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Kornock, Deceased, Petitioner, v. The DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, Honorable Roscoe Pile, Judge, Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad, a Delaware corporation, Respondents. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Benjamin E. Sweet, Dyer & Swenson, Denver, for petitioner.
Ernest Porter, Kenneth D. Barrows, Donald D. Pfeifer, Denver, for respondents.
This is an original proceeding.
On the petition as presented we deemed it advisable to issue a rule to the respondent judge to show cause why the relief prayed for should not be granted. Upon receipt of the answer to the show cause order and the matter now being at issue, it is apparent from what now has been fully revealed as the problem involved, that the rule to show cause was improvidently issued and we should not have granted the petition. We have been favored with oral argument, and we now conclude that the rule should be discharged under the authority of Leonhart v. District Court, 138 Colo. 1, 329 P.2d 781. We adopt therefrom this pertinent language:
The rule is discharged.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weaver Const. Co. v. District Court In and For El Paso County, 4th Judicial Dist., 27016
...a general policy which disfavors the use of an original writ where an appeal would be an appropriate remedy. First National Bank v. District Court, 164 Colo. 9, 432 P.2d 1 (1967); Leonhart v. District Court, 138 Colo. 1, 329 P.2d 781 (1958); Prinster v. District Court, 137 Colo. 393, 325 P.......
-
Varner v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.
...not designed as a substitute for appeal, e. g., Vaughn v. District Court, 192 Colo. 348, 559 P.2d 222 (1977); First National Bank v. District Court, 164 Colo. 9, 432 P.2d 1 (1967), we have exercised our original jurisdiction under C.A.R. 21 when a procedural ruling will have significant eff......
-
Vaughn v. District Court In and For Second Judicial Dist., 27430
...Colo. 1, 329 P.2d 781 (1958). It does not correct mere error or provide a substitute for appeal. See, e.g., First National Bank v. District Court, 164 Colo. 9, 432 P.2d 1 (1967); Prinster v. District Court, 137 Colo. 393, 325 P.2d 938 (1958). Compare Weaver Construction Co. v. District Cour......
-
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Frederick, 23108
... ... No. 23108 ... Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc ... Oct. 2, 1967 ... ...