First Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co., No. 50061

• Court: Missouri Supreme Court
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM; EAGER
• Citation: 376 S.W.2d 164
• Parties: The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, a Corporation, Successor Trustee under the Will of Daniel F. Trigg, deceased, Respondent, v. MERCANTILE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant.
• Docket Number: No. 50061
• Decision Date: 09 March 1964

Page 164

376 S.W.2d 164 The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, a
Corporation, Successor Trustee under the Will of
Daniel F. Trigg, deceased, Respondent,
v.
MERCANTILE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant. No. 50061. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. March 9, 1964.

Page 165

Jack B. Robertson, Rogers, Field & Gentry, Kansas City, for appellant.

Donald H. Chisholm, Stinson, Mag, Thomson, McEvers & Fizzell, Charles C. Oliver, Jr., Kansas City, for respondent.

Thompson, Mitchell, Douglas & Neill, James M. Douglas, Robert Neill, W. Stanley Walch, St. Louis, for Mercantile Trust Co., amicus curiae.

Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, George W. Simpkins, Robert H. McRoberts, Jr., St. Louis, for St. Louis Union Trust Co., amicus curiae.

Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen & Chubb, Charles C. Allen, Sr., Charles C. Allen, Jr., St. Louis, for The Boatmen's Nat. Bank of St. Louis, amicus curiae.

James E. Campbell, Kansas City, amicus curiae.

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

This case arose over the appointment of the First National Bank of Kansas City, respondent, as successor testamentary trustee under the will of Daniel F. Trigg, deceased, by the Probate Court of Jackson County, Missouri, at Independence, following which respondent brought a successful action to recover some $6,169.03 (including interest) deposited under said will with appellant bank by the former trustee who is now deceased.

The answer and brief of appellant challenge the constitutionality of two sections of the Probate Code of Missouri, Sections 472.020 and 456.225 [all statutory references are to RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., unless otherwise stated], which sections purport to grant jurisdiction to the probate courts over the administration of testamentary trusts, and to set up the procedure therefor. Thus the appeal, raising the constitutional question, is properly lodged in this court. Mo. Const. Art. V, Sec. 3, V.A.M.S.

The chain of events giving rise to the present litigation is more specifically this: By the last will and testament of Daniel F. Trigg, who died June 25, 1960, the residue of his estate was bequeathed to the executor (William R. Moore) of his will as 'Trustee for the members of the Local Camp of the Boy Scouts of America and to be used by said Camp in Oak Grove, Missouri, only as directed by its officers, * * *.' This will contains no directions as to a successor trustee of the trust estate. The estate was duly administered, distribution was made, and William R. Moore, as trustee, on October 11, 1961, deposited the distributive share of the trust (then $6,092.22) in an interest bearing savings account with appellant, in the name 'Boy Scout Troop of Oak Grove, Missouri.' William R. Moore died on June 3, 1962.

Thereafter, the Kansas City Area Council Boy Scouts of Missouri filed its petition in the probate court, alleging the foregoing facts, and further that there is no entity known as the 'Local Camp of Boy Scouts of America' in Oak Grove, Missouri, but that in Oak Grove there are functioning groups of 'Boy Scouts' designated as Troop 266 and Pack 266, and Troop 422 and Pack 422, which have charters from petitioner

Page 166

and the National Council of Boy Scouts of America. The petitioner then prayed the probate court for the appointment of a successor trustee to administer said trust under Section 456.225. The Oak Grove 'Committees' of the troop and pack groups located there also filed their petition joining with the above named petitioner, and adopted the allegations of the latter.

On September 19, 1962, the probate court by order appointed respondent as successor trustee to William R. Moore, deceased, under the will of said Daniel F. Trigg, deceased. Thereafter, respondent filed its petition in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, attaching thereto as exhibits the probate court proceedings as set forth above, and prayed judgment against appellant for the amount of the aforesaid savings account upon the grounds that appellant had refused to register the account in the name of the appointed successor trustee, or to honor its request for withdrawal of the funds.

By answer, appellant admitted the facts alleged in the circuit court petition, but averred that it is in doubt as to the jurisdiction of the probate court to render the judgment, decree and order of September 19, 1962, and that it is in doubt as to whether or not it would be protected from further liability in the event of claims against it by or on behalf of the beneficiaries of the trust. Further answering, appellant alleged that said sections 456.225 and 472.020 are unconstitutional insofar as they purport to confer any jurisdiction whatsoever upon the probate court with respect to the matters and things in said judgment, decree and order, and that said sections violate Section 16 Article V of the Missouri Constitution in that it is not within the power of the legislature to determine that any part of the administration of a testamentary trust is within the scope of 'matters pertaining to probate business' as such term is used in said section of the Constitution.

The statutory enactments which are here in controversy are as follows:

'472.020 Jurisdiction of probate court. The probate court has jurisdiction over all matters pertaining to probate business, to granting letters testamentary and of administration, the appointment of guardians of minors and persons of unsound mind, settling the accounts of executors, administrators and guardians, and the sale or leasing of lands by executors, administrators and guardians, including jurisdiction of the construction of wills as an incident to the administration of estates, of the determination of heirship, of the administration of testamentary trusts and of such other probate business as may be prescribed by law. (L.1955, p. 385, Sec. 3.)' (Emphasis supplied.)

'456.225 Testamentary trusts--bond required, when--accounting may be required, procedure.

'1. Before rendering any decree of partial or final distribution of any bequest or...