First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Henning, 15198.
Decision Date | 19 June 1944 |
Docket Number | 15198. |
Citation | 150 P.2d 790,112 Colo. 523 |
Parties | FIRST NAT. BANK OF DENVER v. HENNING. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; Floyd F. Miles Judge.
Action by W. F. Henning against the First National Bank of Denver to recover the amount of a cashier's check deposited by the plaintiff. To review a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant brings error.
Reversed.
Hughes & Dorsey, Montgomery Dorsey, and Thomas Keely, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
F. W Harding, of Denver, for defendant in error.
An action to recover the amount of a cashier's check deposited by defendant in error in the First National Bank of Denver. On a verdict in favor of defendant in error, judgment against plaintiff in error was entered. A motion to set the judgment aside and for judgment in favor of the plaintiff in error, or, in the alternative, for a new trial, was denied. Counsel for the bank in their specification of points assert that numerous errors to its prejudice appear. In our view it is necessary to consider but two of the points raised.
There is no conflict in the evidence. W. F. Henning, plaintiff below, is a resident of Casper, Wyoming. In April, 1941, a brother of Henning, a resident of Denver, opened a checking account for him in the First National Bank of Denver, and the bank issued and delivered to the brother the form of passbook generally issued to its customers, made out in Henning's name. A few days after the deposit made by his brother, Henning personally deposited the cashier's check here involved, using the form of deposit slip to which we hereinafter refer, and received from the teller a duplicate of such slip. The check was issued by and drawn on the Casper National Bank, was made payable to Henning and was endorsed by him in blank. At the close of the business day on which the check was deposited, the bank, in accordance with its long standing custom and that of Denver and other banks generally, placed the check and other items drawn on the Casper bank in an envelope addressed to that bank, enclosed the usual 'collection letter,' affixed the proper postage and sealed and deposited it in the United States mails. Although there is no direct evidence to that effect counsel for Henning asserts in his argument, and we will assume, that the check, and the items enclosed with it, did not reach the Casper bank, and were lost in transit. Neither is there direct evidence as to whether the Casper bank would or would not have paid the check if it had been presented, nor is there satisfactory showing that the Casper bank is unwilling to make Henning whole, but we will assume, again adopting Henning's assertions, that the Casper bank would have paid the check on presentation, and that it has refused to make Henning whole unless he shall furnish surety, at considerable expense, and requiring indemnification of the surety in case of loss, by a deposit of cash in an amount in excess of the face of the check. It is plain, however, that the Casper bank received and retains Henning's money in the amount of the check, paid to it when the check was issued, and that the Denver bank has not, and never has had Henning's money or anything but the possession for a time of the check.
The passbook issued to Henning at the time of the initial deposit contains the preliminary words on the first page thereof, 'In Account with W. F. Henning,' and the following, concluded on the last page:
'Items drawn on this bank found not good at close of business on day of deposit may be charged to depositor.
'This account is subject to such charges and conditions as may from time to time be decided upon by the Denver Clearing House Association, or imposed by law.
'The use of this book by a depositor constitutes his assent to the foregoing conditions which shall be applicable to all transactions between the customer and this bank.'
On the day Henning deposited the check he signed the form of 'signature card' employed by the bank. The card contains, above the signature of Henning, this printed language:
The deposit slip used by Henning in depositing the check bears on its face these words:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cox v. Metropolitan State Bank, Inc., 18230
...otherwise, or for loss of items in mail.' It has been held that such a deposit slip is contractual in nature, First National Bank of Denver v. Henning, 112 Colo. 523, 150 P.2d 790; American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Dennis, 90 Wash. 547, 156 P. 559; Ryan v. Columbia National Bank, 142 S.C......
-
People v. Todd, 26209
...Todd's home address in the usual course of business. See Olsen v. Davidson, 142 Colo. 205, 350 P.2d 338 (1960); First National Bank v. Henning, 112 Colo. 523, 150 P.2d 790 (1944); National Motors v. Newman, 29 Colo.App. 380, 484 P.2d 125 (1971); 1 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 95 (3rd ed. 19740). ......
-
Hartwell v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.
... ... Atler, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error ... Archibald ... first chance to purchase the harvester if he so ... 101, 278 P. 611; ... Tisdel v. Bank, 90 Colo. 114, 6 P.2d 912; First ... Nat. Bank ... Henning, 112 Colo. 523, 150 P.2d [117 Colo ... 296] ... ...
-
Pletchas v. Von Poppenheim
...the existence of a usage imposes the duty on the court to give it recognition and efficacy as a matter of law. First Nat. Bank of Denver v. Henning, 112 Colo. 523, 150 P.2d 790. Thus considered we deem the action of the trial court regular and proper in recognizing and applying the custom i......