First Nat. Bank v. Wood County
Decision Date | 13 April 1927 |
Docket Number | (No. 3368.) |
Citation | 294 S.W. 324 |
Parties | FIRST NAT. BANK OF QUITMAN v. WOOD COUNTY et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Wood County; J. R. Warren, Judge.
Suit by Wood County against the First National Bank of Quitman, wherein defendant by cross-action impleaded Don Roberts, County Treasurer, and others. Judgment for plaintiff against defendant and denying recovery in cross-action, and defendant appeals. Modified, and, as modified, affirmed.
Wood county, by authority and direction of the commissioners' court, brought the suit against the First National Bank of Quitman to recover a judgment for $790.54 deposited with it and payment refused after demand. The First National Bank of Quitman was the duly appointed depository for the funds of Wood county, and had received on deposit the various funds of the county in sums largely in excess of $790.54. The suit involves forged checks paid by the bank and charged up against the account of the county treasurer. The First National Bank of Quitman pleaded a general denial to the claim of the county, and by a cross-action impleaded Don Roberts the county treasurer, the First National Bank of Mineola, the First State Bank of Alba, the Alba National Bank, the First National Bank of Winnsboro, and the Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro, to recover against them proportionally the aggregate sum of $790.54. The cross-action, as against the banks, is to recover back the money paid to their use as holders of the forged checks, upon the ground, in effect, that they negligently caused the drawee bank to take and make payment of the forged checks as genuine. The banks pleaded, in effect, that they were innocent holders in good faith of the checks for value, and were entitled to retain the money paid to them by the drawee bank. The action against the treasurer was based upon negligence in failing to give timely notice of certain of the forgeries after receiving the bank's statement. There was a nonjury trial, resulting in a judgment against the First National Bank of Quitman in favor of Wood county, and in denial of recovery in the cross-action of the bank.
Don Roberts qualified as county treasurer of Wood county on January 12, 1925. Then and prior thereto the county funds of Wood county were on deposit in the First National Bank of Quitman, the regular county depository. Shortly before January 12, 1925, the county commissioners' court had allowed claims against the county in favor of ten persons, in amounts ranging from $25 to $152, aggregating $790.54. Don Roberts, the county treasurer, drew a check on the First National Bank of Quitman in favor of each of the persons having such claims, for the amount thereof, and delivered them; and such persons presented the checks and received the money thereon. All of the checks were not issued on the same date. Three of them were issued on January 12, 1925; four were issued on February 9, 1925; one was issued on February 14, 1925; one was issued on March 9, 1925; and one was issued on March 10, 1925. Subsequently, as appears, ten checks were issued duplicating the above-mentioned ten checks in all respects, as to dates, persons, and amounts. Such checks were drawn on the "First National Bank of Quitman" and signed by "Don Roberts, County Treasurer." These latter ten checks were forgeries in entirety, committed by a third party whose name is given in the record. And such person presented these forged checks to and had them cashed by the several banks, parties defendant. The purported names of the payees in indorsement were forgeries. All of the notes are set out in the evidence. It is sufficient to set out of the following, which is a copy of one of them:
Indorsed on back: "Mineola Machine Shop, Grover Smith."
Stamped on back:
Perforated: "Paid 3-30-25."
The court made findings of fact substantially as follows: That the First National Bank of Mineola, in due course of business, acquired two of the notes and forwarded them to the First National Bank of Quitman for collection, and was by said bank paid on February 17, 1925. The Alba National Bank in due course of business acquired one of the notes and forwarded it for collection, and same was paid by the First National Bank of Quitman on February 20, 1925. The First State Bank of Alba, Tex., acquired one of the notes in due course of business and forwarded it for collection to the First National Bank of Quitman, Tex., and was paid by said last-named bank on February 20, 1925. The Merchants' & Planters' State Bank of Winnsboro acquired three of the notes in due course of business and timely forwarded them for collection to the First National Bank of Quitman, and was timely paid by said bank on, respectively, March 3, March 12, and March 30, 1925. The First National Bank of Winnsboro acquired three of the notes in due course of business and timely forwarded them for collection to the First National Bank of Quitman, and was by it timely paid on, respectively, March 12, March 13, and April 20, 1925. The court made the further finding:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Surety Co. v. State Trust & Savings Bank
...be sustained and appellee's overruled. City Bank of Houston v. First Nat. Bank of Houston, 45 Tex. 203; First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Wood County et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 294 S. W. 324; First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank of Quitman (Tex. Com. App.) 299 S. W. 856; Farmers' Nat. B......
-
Urwiller v. Platte Val. State Bank
...Nat. Bank of Goree v. Tally, 115 Tex. 591, 285 S.W. 612; Hunt v. Security State Bank, 91 Or. 362, 179 P. 248; First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Wood County, Tex.Civ.App., 294 S.W. 324; First Nat. Bank of Washington v. Whitman, 94 U.S. 343, 24 L.Ed. 229; First Nat. Bank of Pukwana v. Brule Nat. ......
-
L. G. Balfour Co. v. State Trust & Savings Bank
...such payment was authorized. First Nat. Bank of Weslaco v. Patty, Tex.Civ.App., 62 S.W.2d 629, 630, par. 2; First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Wood County, Tex.Civ.App., 294 S.W. 324, par. 2, affirmed First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank, Tex.Com.App., 299 S.W. 856; 7 Am.Jur., p. 362 ......
-
Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v. Hampton State Bank
...Nat'l Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat'l Bank of Quitman, 299 S.W. 856 (Tex.Comm'n App.1927), aff'g First Nat'l Bank of Quitman v. Wood County, 294 S.W. 324 (Tex.Civ.App., Texarkana 1927), in which the Commission of Appeals held that a payor bank could recover from a collecting bank money pai......