First National Bank of Salem v. Almy

Decision Date08 May 1875
Citation117 Mass. 476
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesFirst National Bank of Salem v. James F. Almy & others

Argued November 5, 1874

Essex. Contract upon a promissory note for $ 1300, signed by "The Salem and New York Express Steamship Corporation by J. H. Webb, Trs.," payable to the order of the corporation three months after date, and indorsed to the plaintiff. The case was heard in this court upon the following agreed facts:

On May 31, 1871, John Daland, Walworth S. Crane, Willard P Phillips, Charles H. Price and others, associated themselves together, by an agreement in writing, with the intention of organizing a corporation under the St. of 1870, c. 224, to be established at Salem, for the purpose of doing business as a common carrier between the cities of Salem in this Commonwealth, and New York, by the name of "The Salem and New York Express Steamship Corporation," with a capital of $ 35,000, to be divided into three hundred and fifty shares of the par value of $ 100 each.

A meeting for the purpose of organizing such corporation, and the transaction of any other business connected therewith was held upon May 8, 1871, at which a board of seven directors, a clerk and treasurer, were duly chosen, and by-laws were adopted. On July 17, 1871, a certificate was made, signed and sworn to by the president, treasurer and a majority of the directors, setting forth a true copy of the agreement of association, and the names of the subscribers thereto, the date of the first meeting and the adjournment thereof. This certificate, together with the records of the corporation up to that time, was submitted to the commissioner of corporations, and the same were duly approved by him, and on July 19, 1871, the Secretary of the Commonwealth issued to the corporation a certificate of its organization and establishment.

The full amount of $ 35,000, or three hundred and fifty shares named and fixed in the said agreement of the company, was never subscribed, but only the sum of $ 25,700, or two hundred fifty-seven shares, and of the amount subscribed only $ 25,600 was ever paid in. The corporation commenced business before the full amount of the capital stock was subscribed and before the full amount had been paid in, no certificate according to the St. of 1870, c. 224, § 32, having then or since been filed.

Certificates were duly made and filed in 1872 and 1873, in accordance with the provisions of § 33, of the said act. Upon June 22 and before the capital stock had been fully paid in, the corporation commenced a negotiation for the purchase of a steamship, and paid certain moneys on account thereof. All the defendants named in the plaintiff's writ subscribed for stock in the corporation.

The consideration for the note declared on was the furnishing of provisions to the corporation for use upon its steamships in the prosecution of the business thus commenced; and the note was duly indorsed to the plaintiff by the payee.

The plaintiff contends that the defendants were prohibited by statute from doing business as a corporation at the time that the indebtedness, for which this note was given, was incurred; and that the defendants are liable to the plaintiff as partners. The defendants object to the introduction of any of said facts in evidence, and deny that they are liable in any way to the plaintiff.

If upon these facts, or such of them as may be competent, the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • Crouch v. Gray
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1926
    ...officers of corporations individually liable to creditors until the stock has been subscribed or paid in. This was the holding in Bank v. Almy, 117 Mass. 476; Cummings v. Winn, 89 Mo. 51, 14 S. W. 512; Hill v. Stetler, 127 Pa. 145, 13 A. 306, 17 A. 887; Crease v. Babcock, 51 Mass. (10 Metc.......
  • Doty v. Patterson
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 7, 1900
    ...65 N.W. 291; Merchants, etc., Bank v. Stone, 38 Mich. 779; Fay v. Noble, 61 Mass. 188; Trowbridge v. Scudder, 65 Mass. 83; First Nat. Bank v. Almy, 117 Mass. 476; Second Nat. Bank v. Hall, 35 Ohio St. Humphreys v. Mooney, 5 Colo. 282; Gartside Coal Co. v. Maxwell, 22 F. 197; Larned v. Beal,......
  • Perkins v. Rouss
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1901
    ... ... Granby, etc., Co. v. Richards, 8 S.W. 246; Bank ... v. Investment Co., 12 S.W. 101; Powder Co. v ... 481, s.c. 3 N.E. 357; Bank v ... Almy, 117 Mass. 476; Vanneman v. Young, 30 A ... 53; Beach on ... ...
  • Hessig-Ellis Drug Co. v. Wilkerson
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 22, 1917
    ...91 Ala. 224; 8 So. 658, 24 Am. St. 887, 11 L. R. A. 515; 126 Cal. 541; 5 Colo. 282; 47 Conn. 443; 69 Ga. 159; 155 Ind. 60; 50 La. Ann. 3; 117 Mass. 476; 38 Mich. 779; 45 Neb. 176; 48 N. J. L. 599; O. St. 158; 22 Ore. 218; 91 Ala. 224; 4 Thomp. Cor. (2 Ed.), sec. 4738. We submit that the jud......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT