First Palmetto State Bank and Trust Co. v. Simkins, No. 1215

• Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
• Writing for the Court: SHAW; BELL, J., and LITTLEJOHN
• Citation: 296 S.C. 345,372 S.E.2d 592
• Parties: , 7 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 504 FIRST PALMETTO STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent, v. A. Wilson SIMKINS, Appellant. . Heard
• Docket Number: No. 1215
• Decision Date: 18 May 1988

Page 592

372 S.E.2d 592 296 S.C. 345, 7 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 504 FIRST PALMETTO STATE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Respondent,
v.
A. Wilson SIMKINS, Appellant. No. 1215. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 18, 1988.
Decided Aug. 29, 1988.

[296 S.C. 346] John W. Foard and Joseph C. Coleman, Columbia, for appellant.

Donald E. Rothwell, Columbia, for respondent.

SHAW, Judge:

Respondent, First Palmetto State Bank and Trust Company, (hereinafter First Palmetto), sued appellant, A. Wilson Simkins, for judgment on a promissory note. Simkins answered and counterclaimed for damages alleging conspiracy to defraud. The trial judge granted First Palmetto's motion for dismissal to the counterclaim and, following a nonjury trial, found in favor of First Palmetto. Simkins appeals. We affirm.

In March of 1985, Joel Hendrix, owner of the adult book store Carolina Amusements,

Page 593

contacted Rick Bradley, a vice president of First Palmetto, to procure a loan to finance the purchase and installation of videotape equipment. Hendrix requested that the manager of his book store, Harry Olsen, be allowed to sign a $55,000 promissory note for the funds, and Bradley agreed. Subsequently, Olsen went by First Palmetto and signed the note. Bradley neither looked into Olsen's financial situation nor had Olsen fill out a financial [296 S.C. 347] statement as it was understood between Bradley and Hendrix that Hendrix through the book store would make the payments.

Bradley never recorded the Olsen note in bank records, but kept it on his desk. When he later learned Olsen was going to jail, Bradley contacted Hendrix and informed him someone else would have to sign the note. As a result, in May of 1985 Simkins, at Hendrix's behest, went to First Palmetto and signed the note sued on in this action. Bradley then destroyed the Olsen note. The Simkins note was given to discharge the Olsen note. Bradley testified the note was filled out and he believed Simkins looked over it before he signed it. No payments were made on the note.

Defendant Simkins answering: in his First Defense admits the execution of the note and admits that no payments were made; in his Second Defense he asserts want of consideration; in his Third Defense he asserts failure of consideration; in the Fourth Defense he asserts no valid agreement; in his Fifth Defense he asserts that the note was created and used solely to cover up embezzlement prohibited by public policy. He then proceeds to allege as a defense a counterclaim asserting fraud and deceit on the part of the plaintiff bank acting by and through its Vice-President Bradley. In his counterclaim he seeks damages for mental...