Fisher v. State
| Decision Date | 27 September 1971 |
| Docket Number | No. 26748,26748 |
| Citation | 184 S.E.2d 156,228 Ga. 100 |
| Parties | Robert Willie FISHER v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. The trial court did not err in not charging the law of voluntary manslaughter, as there was no evidence in the record to demand or even authorize such a charge.
2. The trial court correctly charged as follows: 'When the State's evidence shows the commission of a homicide by the accused, by the use of a deadly weapon, the law presumes murder.'
3. The verdict is supported by the evidence.
Glenn Zell, Atlanta, for appellant.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joel M. Feldman, Carter Goode, Creighton W. Sossomon, Tony H. High, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Under an indictment charging him with the offense of murder of Willie M. Miller by shooting with a pistol, the appellant Robert W. Fisher, was, on his trial, found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment. His amended motion for a new trial was overruled and notice of appeal was filed.
Error is enumerated on three grounds.
1. It is asserted that the court erred in not charging the law of voluntary manslaughter. The court charged the jury on the law as to murder, involuntary manslaughter and accident.
The sole defense of the appellant was that the pistol was accidentally fired. There is no evidence in the record to demand or even authorize a charge on the law of voluntary manslaughter.
2. The court charged the jury as follows: 'When the State's evidence shows the commission of a homicide by the accused, by the use of a deadly weapon, the law presumes murder.' Error is assigned on the above charge on the ground that it shifted the burden of proof to the appellant and relieved the State of proving malice, and it was confusing, misleading, and prejudicial.
The charge given stated a correct principle of law. This Court in Ogletree v. State, 209 Ga. 413(3), 73 S.E.2d 201, said: 'When, as in this case, the State's evidence shows the commission of a homicide by the accused, by the use of a deadly weapon, the law presumes murder, and it is then incumbent upon the defendant to show the killing to have been otherwise.'
The court fully charged on the law relating to murder, malice, involuntary manslaughter, accident and misfortune, presumption of innocence, and the burden upon the State to prove...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Favors v. State
...shows mitigating circumstances, justification or alleviation (Jordon v. State, 232 Ga. 749(5), 208 S.E.2d 840). Cf. Fisher v. State, 228 Ga. 100, 184 S.E.2d 156; McClendon v. State, 231 Ga. 47(2), 199 S.E.2d There was some evidence to sustain the jury's finding of malice and hence to suppor......
-
McCorquodale v. Stynchcombe
...(1932); Plummer v. State, 200 Ga. 641(1), 38 S.E.2d 411 (1946); Carrigan v. State, 206 Ga. 707, 58 S.E.2d 407 (1950); Fisher v. State, 228 Ga. 100(2), 184 S.E.2d 156 (1971). Finally, paragraphs 24 and 25 raise the new issues relating to post-conviction insanity which the habeas court thorou......
-
Davis v. State
...Ga. 307, 165 S.E. 232; Plummer v. State, 200 ga. 641(1), 38 S.E.2d 411; Carrigan v. State, 206 Ga. 707, 58 S.E.2d 407; Fisher v. State, 228 Ga. 100(2), 184 S.E.2d 156; Chandle v. State, 230 Ga. 574(1), 198 S.E.2d 289; Wilburn v. State, 230 Ga. 675(1), 198 S.E.2d 857. There is no merit in th......
-
Jordon v. State, 28954
...defense. While language in charges similar to these quoted excerpts have been approved by this court (for instance see Fisher v. State, 228 Ga. 100(2), 184 S.E.2d 156; Chandle v. State, 230 Ga. 574(3), 198 S.E.2d 289), these instructions were not adjusted to the evidence in the present case......