Fitchburg R. Co. v. Fitchburg
Decision Date | 23 October 1876 |
Citation | 121 Mass. 132 |
Parties | Fitchburg Railroad Company v. City of Fitchburg |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Worcester. Tort for breaking and entering the plaintiff's close. Writ dated December 31, 1874. Trial in the Superior Court before Putnam, J., without a jury, who allowed a bill of exceptions in substance as follows:
The trespasses complained of were admitted by the defendant to have been done by its agent; and the title of the plaintiff to the land in question was also admitted.
On August 26, 1868, the following petition, signed by David Boutelle and nine others, was presented to the selectmen of Fitchburg:
On the same day the selectmen passed the following order:
After the hearing mentioned in the order, the selectmen proceeded to lay out a town way, to be called Depot Court, and described and located it in the report of their doings to the town, on October 26, 1868. One C. L. Heywood, superintendent of the Fitchburg Railroad Company, acknowledged notice upon the back of said petition, on September 2, 1868, but there was no other evidence of any authority on his part so to do except his thus signing his name. There was no other evidence of notice...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Monroe
...of the requirements, that of notice of the intended proceedings, would be the chief." Harris v. Marblehead, 10 Gray 40; Railroad v. Fitchburg, 121 Mass. 132; People ex rel. v. Kniskern, 54 N.Y. Skinner v. Lake View Ave. Co., 57 Ill. 151. Our conclusion is that in the absence of the notice r......
-
Horbach v. City of Omaha
... ... 229; ... Edmiston v. Edmiston, 2 Ohio 251; Fass v ... Seehawer, 60 Wis. 525, 19 N.W. 533; Grace v. Board ... of Health, 135 Mass. 490; Fitchburg R. Co. v. City ... of Fitchburg, 121 Mass. 132; Northampton v ... Abell, 127 Mass. 507; Hutchinson v. City of ... Omaha, 52 Neb. 345, 72 N.W ... ...
-
Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation v. City of Springfield
... ... the essential facts required by law or by contract, as the ... case may be. Fitchburg Railroad v. Fitchburg, 121 ... Mass. 132 ... Shea v. Lowell, 132 Mass. 187 ... Wilson v. Crooker, 145 Mass. 571 ... Carver v ... Taunton, 152 ... ...
-
Comm'r of Corps. & Taxation v. City of Springfield
...or obligations must state with reasonable certainty the essential facts required by law or by contract, as the case may be. Fitchburg R. v. Fitchburg, 121 Mass. 132.Shea v. Lowell, 132 Mass. 187.Wilson v. Crooker, 145 Mass. 571, 14 N.E. 798.Inhabitants of Carver v. City of Taunton, 152 Mass......