Fitzsimmons v. State
Citation | 166 P. 453,14 Okla.Crim. 80,1917 OK CR 180 |
Decision Date | 18 July 1917 |
Docket Number | A-2659. [a1] |
Parties | FITZSIMMONS v. STATE. |
Court | United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma |
Syllabus by the Court.
In a prosecution for murder, where the testimony of a witness was given at the preliminary examination, and his testimony was taken by the reporter, in the presence of the defendant and his counsel, who cross-examined him, and such testimony is transcribed and filed with the court clerk, held, that if the witness is not present at the final trial, and the state shows that such witness cannot with due diligence be found within the jurisdiction of the court, the testimony of the witness may be read to the jury; and held further, that it is immaterial that the names of the witnesses used by the state to prove that defendant had been confronted by the witness, and that the witness was then beyond the jurisdiction of the court, were not indorsed upon the information.
Where a party desires the court to give any particular instruction or that the one that is given shall be made more specific or comprehensive, it is the duty of counsel to prepare and present to the court such desired instruction and request that it be given, and in the absence of such request a conviction will not be reversed, unless this court is of the opinion, in the light of the entire record, including the instructions given, that the defendant may have been prejudiced by the instruction complained of.
Where a verdict is clearly sustained by the evidence, a new trial will not be granted for slight inaccuracies in the instructions.
Appeal from District Court, Payne County; A. H. Huston, Judge.
James P. Fitzsimmons was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and appeals. Affirmed.
John P Hickam, of Stillwater, and Vaught & Brewer, of Oklahoma City for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General and R. McMillan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Plaintiff in error, herein referred to as the defendant, was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree on an information filed in the district court of Payne county on the 19th day of April, 1915, charging him with the murder of Jack Corrigan, in said county on the 23d day of March, 1915. In accordance with the verdict of the jury rendered October 15, 1915, he was sentenced to serve a term of five years' imprisonment in the state penitentiary. To reverse the judgment the defendant appealed, by filing in this court on February 28, 1916, a petition in error with case-made.
In order to better understand the errors assigned, the following brief statement of the facts disclosed by the testimony is made; also extracts from the testimony of the witnesses and of the defendant as a witness in his own behalf:
It appears from the evidence that the killing occurred at a roadhouse known as the Line House, situated on the road between Cushing and Drumright. The record shows that the testimony of J. W. Barrett and J. R. Long, as given upon the defendant's preliminary examination, was relied upon by the state to show the circumstances of the killing. The testimony of J. W. Barrett, as read from the transcript by the reporter who took the same, was in substance as follows: That on the date alleged in the information he left Drumright, where he lived at that time, with J. R. Long, and went to the Line House, just across the line in Payne county, about two miles west of Drumright; that they arrived there about 4 o'clock; that he knows the defendant, Fitzsimmons, and saw him when he came into the road house; that at that time Jack Corrigan, the deceased, was standing with his back to the bar and with his elbows on the bar; that when the defendant came in he had a pistol in his hand, and he walked up to the deceased and shot him; that he never saw Jack Corrigan before; that there were six or seven people in the room when the shot was fired; that J. R. Long and J. P. King and a woman called Billie Reed were present at the time; that the deceased sank to the floor, and J. R. Long called for a glass of water and a pillow; that the defendant then made the remark, "If any of his friends wanted any of it, they could get it;" that he later saw the body of the deceased at the undertaker's, and noticed that the bullet entered below the collar bone and passed out near the small of the back; that it was between 4 and 5 o'clock when the shooting occurred; that he left the room and saw the defendant coming out with Billie Reed, and he then went back in; then Billie Reed came back and threw herself on the body. His cross-examination by Mr. Hickam, counsel for the defendant, was in part as follows:
The testimony of J. R. Long is substantially as follows: That he had lived at Drumright about 18 months; was a rig builder; took the witness Barrett and his child to the Line House that afternoon in his automobile; was in the room when the defendant came in and shot Jack Corrigan, who was commonly called "Happy Jack." The defendant came in with Billie Reed, and was holding her by the arm, and she was crying when they entered the door. "Happy Jack" was standing at the bar; the defendant pushed the girl aside and shot him. The man that was shot said nothing. "He just sank down," and witness caught him in his arms and called for water and for something to put under his head. Immediately after shooting Corrigan the defendant said, "If you fellows are friends of this man, and want any of it, you can get it," and then said to the deceased, "Get up and fight, you son of a bitch, like a man;" that the deceased did not have anything in his hands at the time he was shot. His cross-examination by Mr. Hickam was in part as follows:
Roy McClerken, as a witness for the defendant, testified that he knew Jack Corrigan, known as "Happy Jack," for more than a year; that on the day he was shot he went with Oscar Hendricks from Drumright to the Line House; that they arrived there a little after 4 o'clock, and found "Happy Jack" there, and they had a few drinks together. He further testified as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial