Flack v. Cohen, 13177.
Decision Date | 14 July 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 13177.,13177. |
Parties | Mary F. FLACK, Appellant, v. Wilbur J. COHEN, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
J. Nat Hamrick, Rutherfordton, N. C. (J. A. Benoy, Cary, N. C., and Hamrick & Hamrick, Rutherfordton, N. C., on the brief), for appellant.
Robert M. Heier, Atty., Department of Justice (William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Morton Hollander, Atty., Department of Justice, and William Medford, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.
This is an action brought by Mary Flack to review the Secretary's decision denying her disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423(a). Upon concluding that the administrative decision was supported by substantial evidence, the District Court granted the Secretary's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
It is undisputed that since September 30, 1955 the claimant has not satisfied the special earnings requirement of the Act. Therefore she is not entitled to benefits unless she can establish that she was disabled on or before that date. James v. Gardner, 384 F.2d 784 (4 Cir. 1967). She spells out her claim by asserting that she became disabled in May, 1950 by reason of rheumatoid arthritis which rendered her unable to continue her vocation as a beautician or otherwise "engage in any substantial gainful activity."
It is elementary that the Secretary's findings must be accepted if they are supported by substantial evidence. Laws v. Celebrezze, 368 F.2d 640 (4 Cir. 1966). It is equally clear that the reviewing court may not try the case de novo and substitute its own findings for those of the Secretary. Hicks v. Gardner, 393 F.2d 299 (4 Cir. 1968). From this it does not follow, however, that the findings of the administrative agency are to be mechanically accepted. The statutorily granted right of review contemplates more than an uncritical rubber stamping of the administrative action. The guiding standard was well expressed in the landmark case of Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 490, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456, 466 (1951). There the Court was discussing the substantial evidence test as it applies to review of decisions of the NLRB. However, the applicable rule is the same in the present context. Justice Frankfurter declared:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Flaten v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
...Cir.1988); Martonik v. Heckler, 773 F.2d 236, 238 (8th Cir.1985); Jeralds v. Richardson, 445 F.2d 36, 38 (7th Cir.1971); Flack v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 278, 279 (4th Cir.1969).The Ninth Circuit has followed this same approach in a long line of cases beginning with Waters v. Gardner, 452 F.2d 855 ......
-
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Sec.
...it is supported by `substantial evidence.'" Blalock v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir.1972). As noted by Judge Sobeloff in Flack v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 278 (4th Cir.1969), "[f]rom this it does not follow, however, that the findings of the administrative agency are to be mechanically acc......
-
Mingo v. Saul
...statutorily granted right of review contemplates more than an uncritical rubber stamping of the administrative agency." Flack v. Cohen, 413 F.2d 278, 279 (4th Cir. 1969). "[T]he courts must not abdicate their responsibility to give careful scrutiny to the whole record to assure that there i......
-
Priester v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.
... ... uncritical rubber stamping of the administrative ... agency.” Flack v. Cohen , 413 F.2d 278, 279 ... (4th Cir. 1969). “[T]he courts must not abdicate their ... ...
-
Standards of Review and Federal Court Remedies
...scrutinize the administrative proceedings to insure a result consistent with congressional intent and elemental fairness. Flack v. Cohen , 413 F.2d 278, 279-280 (4th Cir. 1969). §202.5 Guesses, Speculations, Common Sense and Ruminations Are Not Substantial Evidence Rescinded SSR 96-2p defin......
-
Standards of Review and Federal Court Remedies
...scrutinize the administrative proceedings to insure a result consistent with congressional intent and elemental fairness. Flack v. Cohen , 413 F.2d 278 (4th Cir. 1969). §202.5 Guesses, Speculations, Common Sense and Ruminations Are Not Substantial Evidence SSR 96-2p defines “ substantial ev......