Flagler Funeral Service, Inc. v. Schulz

Decision Date10 October 1957
Docket NumberNo. 57-89,57-89
Citation97 So.2d 347
PartiesFLAGLER FUNERAL SERVICE, Inc., and lowa Home Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioners, v. Vivian SCHULZ and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Walters, Moore & Costanzo, Miami, for petitioners.

Danton V. Ferrero, Miami, and Rodney Durrance, Tallahassee, for respondents.

HORTON, Judge.

This cause came before the court on a petition for certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission affirming an order of one of the Deputy Industrial Commissioners of Dade County, Florida. The Deputy found that the respondent, Vivian Schulz, was the common law wife of Werner Schulz, who died as the result of an accident while in the employ of the petitioner, Flagler Funeral Service, Inc.; that at the time of his death, there were residing with him Vivian Schulz and three children of Vivian Schulz by a prior marriage, who were dependent upon him for support and entitled to benefits under the Florida Workmen's Compensation Law, Chapter 440, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

The petitioners have assailed the order of the Full Commission affirming the findings of the Deputy that a common law marriage had existed between the respondent, Vivian Schulz, and the deceased, Werner Schulz. We find no error in this order.

Under the Workmen's Compensation Law, Sec. 440.25, FlaStat., F.S.A., as amended, the Deputy is charged with the duty of holding hearings, making determinations of fact and of making a compensation award. After the making of an award, designated in the Act as the 'compensation order,' if no interested person files an application for a review of such order within twenty days with the Full Commission, such order becomes final. The Deputy's position then, under the law, is somewhat analogous to that of a chancellor and the Full Commission then occupies a position similar in many respects to that of an appellate court. The Deputy exercises quasi-judicial functions with the power and authority to make findings of fact and, just as any group or board created by lawful authority, when acting in a quasi-judicial capacity, their findings are entitled to great weight and should not be lightly set aside unless there appears no competent substantial evidence to support their findings and judgment. See Nelson v. State ex rel. Quigg, 156 Fla. 189, 23 So.2d 136; De Groot v. Sheffield, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 912.

Under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Law,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Crane Tile Co. v. Jenkins
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 30, 1958
    ...evidence to support them. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 741; Flagler Funeral Service, Inc., v. Schulz, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 347. We are reluctant to disturb an order of the Commission if a legal basis therefor appears in the record of the proceedi......
  • Sun Ins. Co. v. Boyd
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 18, 1958
    ...appropriate instructions. 1 United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla., 55 So.2d 741; See: Flagler Funeral Service, Inc., v. Schulz, Fla.App., 1957, 97 So.2d 347. ...
  • Stubbs v. C. F. Wheeler Builder, Inc., 58-272
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 28, 1958
    ...of the deputy commissioner. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 741; Flagler Funeral Service, Inc., v. Schulz, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 347. Our review of the record convinces us that there was competent substantial evidence to support the finding of the co......
  • Harris v. Lenk
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1969
    ...not be lightly set aside unless there appears no competent substantial evidence to support the findings. Flager Funeral Service, Inc. v. Schulz, 97 So.2d 347 (Fla.App.3d Dist.1957). The Florida Industrial Commission in its order of reversal stated it was not reasonable that a leg injury giv......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT