Fletcher v. People of State

Decision Date30 September 1869
Citation1869 WL 5455,52 Ill. 395
PartiesSAMUEL FLETCHER et al.v.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of Kane county; the Hon. SYLVANUS WILCOX, Judge, presiding.

The opinion states the case.

Messrs. MAYBORNE & BROWN, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. WASHINGTON BUSHNELL, Attorney General, and Mr. CHARLES J. METZNER, State's Attorney, for the people.

Mr. JUSTICE LAWRENCE delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an indictment against Samuel Fletcher and his wife, Ledicia, for false imprisonment of Samuel Fletcher, junior, the son of Samuel, senior, and step son of Ledicia. The defendants were found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $300 each.

The instructions gave the law correctly to the jury, and so far as relates to Samuel Fletcher, we are of opinion the evidence sustains the verdict. It shows the wanton imprisonment, without a pretense of reasonable cause, of a blind and helpless boy, in a cold and damp cellar without fire, during several days of mid-winter. The boy finally escaped and seems to have been taken in charge by the town authorities. The only excuse given by the father to one of the witnesses who remonstrated with him was, that the boy was covered with vermin, and for this the father annointed his body with kerosene. If the boy was in this wretched state, it must have been because he had received no care from those who should have given it. In view of his blind and helpless condition, the case altogether is one of shocking inhumanity.

Counsel urge, that the law gives parents a large discretion in the exercise of authority over their children. This is true, but this authority must be exercised within the bounds of reason and humanity. If the parent commits wanton and needless cruelty upon his child, either by imprisonment of this character or by inhuman beating, the law will punish him. Thus, in Johnson v. The State, 2 Humphrey, 283, the court held the parents subject to indictment, because, in chastising their child, they had exceeded the bounds of reason, and inflicted a barbarous punishment. It would be monstrous to hold that under the pretense of sustaining parental authority, children must be left, without the protection of the law, at the mercy of depraved men or women, with liberty to inflict any species of barbarity short of the actual taking of life.

In this case, however, the verdict against Ledicia Fletcher was wrong. There...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Green
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 22, 2011
    ...a bench or jury trial. People v. Cooper, 194 Ill.2d 419, 431, 252 Ill.Dec. 458, 743 N.E.2d 32 (2000). ¶ 20 Defendant cites Fletcher v. People, 52 Ill. 395 (1869), for the proposition that the legal system will not punish a parent for disciplining his or her child as long as the parent does ......
  • People v. Roberts
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 30, 2004
    ...In People v. Ball, 58 Ill.2d 36, 39, 317 N.E.2d 54, 56 (1974), the supreme court stated: "This court recognized in Fletcher v. People (1869), 52 Ill. 395, 397, that a parent's disciplinary authority over his children `must be exercised within the bounds of reason and humanity.' Subsequent a......
  • People v. Mulvey
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • July 19, 2006
    ...child is deeply rooted in the common law of this state. See, e.g., People v. Ball, 58 Ill.2d 36, 39, 317 N.E.2d 54 (1974); Fletcher v. People, 52 Ill. 395, 397 (1869); Roberts, 351 Ill.App.3d at 688, 286 Ill.Dec. 524, 814 N.E.2d 174; In re F.W., 261 Ill.App.3d 894, 898, 199 Ill.Dec. 769, 63......
  • People v. Johnson, 84-0394
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • June 12, 1985
    ...of authority over their children[,] * * * this authority must be exercised within the bounds of reason and humanity." (Fletcher v. People (1869), 52 Ill. 395, 397.) Defendant posits that the infliction of two red marks on Frederick's back constituted reasonable parental discipline despite t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT