Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc., 75--19
| Decision Date | 09 December 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 75--19,75--19 |
| Citation | 324 So.2d 135 |
| Parties | Shirley FLETCHER, Appellant, v. PETMAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Colson & Hicks, Susan Goldman, Miami, for appellant.
Kates, Ress, Gomez & Rosenberg, North Miami, and Linda M. Rigot, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
This is an appeal in a negligence action from an order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff, Shirley Fletcher, filed a complaint for damages against defendant Petman Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a the Yorkshire Inn, and its liability insurer, Safeco Insurance Company of America, for injuries suffered as a result of a fall at 10:30 p.m. on March 31, 1973. Plaintiff alleged that on the evening in question, she and a male companion along with her sister and brother-in-law had dined at the Yorkshire Inn. Upon exiting, plaintiff and her sister sat on a bench in front of the inn while waiting for their car to be delivered. The bench was located approximately 8 3/4 inches above the driveway elevation and it was two steps down to the driveway pavement. When their car arrived, plaintiff got up from the bench, took a few steps, and, as testified in her deposition, the next thing she knew she had fallen. Plaintiff further testified she was unaware the steps existed because she entered the restaurant by walking up a ramp.
Plaintiff basically alleges (1) the steps were not of uniform design and construction, (2) the steps were not apparent, (3) there was inadequate lighting in the area, and (4) placement of the bench was improper.
Upon reviewing the propriety of a summary judgment, the classic inquiry is whether or not there remains genuine issues of material fact and if issues of fact exist and the slightest doubt remains, a summary judgment cannot be granted and all doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue of material fact must be resolved against the moving party. Fletcher Co. v. Melroe Manufacturing Co., Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 191.
In the cause before us, we find there exists genuine issues as to material facts, i.e. design of the steps, adequacy of the lighting, etc. See Coburn v. Delmonico Hotel Corp., Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 30; Winsemann v. Travelodge Corporation, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 315; Robinson v. Kiwanis Club of Delray Beach, Fla.App.1972, 265 So.2d 387.
In addition, we note that although plaintiff was unable to recall...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wong v. Crown Equipment Corp.
...and designedly fall. [e.s.] (footnotes omitted) Majeske, 117 So.2d at 533-34. Similarly, we said in Fletcher v. Petman Enters., Inc., 324 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975): [W]e note that although plaintiff was unable to recall precisely what caused her fall, this fact would not entitle defendan......
-
194th St. Hotel Corp. v. Hopf
...area was insufficiently lighted. See Fountainhead Motel, Inc. v. Massey, 336 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc., 324 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Robinson v. Kiwanis Club of Delray Beach, 265 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). There was thus ample evidence that ......
-
Bianchi v. Garber
...was the proximate cause and that evidence precluded a summary judgment grounded on the Adkins decision. See Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc., 324 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), where a restaurant patron sued for damages resulting from a fall outside the restaurant. Although the patron co......
-
City of South Miami v. Pytel, s. 81-72
...the piece of metal piping. This clearly is not the law. Roach v. Raubar, 362 So.2d 84 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Fletcher v. Petman Enterprises, Inc., 324 So.2d 135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Majeske v. Palm Beach Kennel Club, 117 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 122 So.2d 408 (Fla.1960). Consequen......